cie-literature-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited cie-literature-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
cie-submission）| 审稿期待（投稿指南口径） | 达标证据 | 退稿/退修模式 |
|---|---|---|
| 述评而非罗列 | 按线索分类 + 指出每条线索的不足 | "A 发现…B 发现…"流水账 |
| 体现前沿性 | 含近五年中英文前沿成果 | 文献停在三五年前、缺国际前沿 |
| 缺口对应贡献 | 每条不足映射本文一条边际贡献 | 综述很全但看不出本文进入点 |
| 引用纪律 | 仅引高质量学术文献 | 用新闻、政策文件、网站充数 |
| 述评与理论分开 | 文献述评归综述、机制推演归理论 | 把文献综述当理论分析写 |
罗列式综述、缺口不清是本刊文献部分的典型退修点；具体口径以编辑部最新《投稿（修改）指南》为准。
围绕"智能制造/数字化政策对企业生产率"组织三条线索，每条收口到"做到哪、缺什么"：
三条不足一一对齐三条边际贡献，缺口清晰，接 cie-institutional-background。注意：方法类文献（如 DID 估计量演进）按指南并入实证检验部分，不堆在综述里。
【述评模式】述评 √ / 罗列（需改）
【线索分类】<线索1 / 线索2 / 线索3>
【缺口】<明确 / 模糊>
【近五年覆盖】足 / 不足
【贡献映射】缺口→贡献 对齐 / 未对齐
【下一步】cie-institutional-background~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.