automatica — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited automatica (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Automatica is the IFAC-affiliated flagship journal of systems and control, publishing rigorous, methodologically developed contributions across control, estimation, identification, optimization, and the analysis of dynamical systems. The defining expectation is a method with theoretical guarantees — stability, convergence, optimality, robustness — developed with enough breadth and depth to constitute an archival advance, not a single narrow result. Compared with its sibling ieee-transactions-on-automatic-control, Automatica leans toward fuller methodological development and breadth, whereas TAC also carries sharp short Technical Notes; route by the form and length of the main result. Application papers that tune a known controller, and simulation studies with no generalizable guarantee, are a poor fit. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool. It does not replace the journal's current official author guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live Automatica author information.
systems-theory manuscript and wants a fit/framing check.
with stated guarantees and developed generality.
ieee-transactions-on-automatic-controlby the form and length of the result, or between a full paper and a brief paper.
application-heavy work.
predictive, and geometric control, developed as a general method.
or error guarantees.
consensus and distributed optimization with proofs.
the result carries rigorous stability/convergence/regret guarantees.
proofs under clearly stated, non-vacuous assumptions; breadth of applicability is valued.
only under assumptions presupposing the conclusion is not a contribution.
substitute for the proofs.
its properties, and discuss its scope and limitations.
system class, tighter bounds, constructive vs. existence, improved computation.
before any result is stated.
full papers and shorter Brief Papers — match the article type to the scope and re-check current definitions and length policy on the live guide.
the contribution; it is not an application survey.
appendix per current format); a clear method statement precedes the analysis.
paper rests on its theorems, not its simulations.
../../resources/source-basis.md and../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the Elsevier anchors, then cite the current Automatica author-information page you checked.
Elsevier/Editorial Manager version.
Automatica/Elsevier manuscript format.
disclosure requirements, and open-access options.
instructions win.
ieee-transactions-on-automatic-control.ieee-transactions-on-signal-processing.ieee-transactions-on-robotics / the-international-journal-of-robotics-research.ieee-transactions-on-industrial-electronics.[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Automatica
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest control subtopics>
[Contribution type] method-with-guarantee / analysis result / identification-estimation method
[Method/evidence] <does the result clear Automatica's breadth + proof-rigor bar?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Article type] Regular paper / Brief Paper
[Official items to re-check] <article type / length / format / data-code / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.