asr-submission — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited asr-submission (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The last check before submitting through Sage Track (ScholarOne Manuscript Central). ASR is masked, so the most common avoidable failure is an under-anonymized manuscript or a missing separate title page. Verify volatile specifics (fee, caps, editors) on the official page first.
mc.manuscriptcentral.com/asr.separate title page (institutional affiliations, acknowledgments, word count, corresponding- author contact). You may cite your own work but not in identifying wording.
designs/methods, broad sociological appeal, and theory development that transcends subfields — a fit mismatch is a desk-reject risk before review.
resubmit a rejected manuscript.
figures excluded); Comments/Replies ≤ 3,000 words (uploaded directly in Sage Track).
stricter 200-word ceiling for the check), no identifying information.
margins; ASA Style Guide (7th ed., 2022)** with author-year in-text citations for references.
student members** (verified 2026-06-22; re-check the amount before paying).
asr-tables-figures)asr-data-and-transparency)The ASA's flagship returns or delays papers most often for masking and length-accounting errors, not for science — all within your control. Confirm any volatile figure against the current guidelines first.
| Trip-wire | Consequence | Fix before upload |
|---|---|---|
| Title page in the manuscript | masking broken | strip it; use the separate title-page file |
| "in our prior study" wording | de-anonymizes the author | neutralize to "in a prior study" |
| References left out of word count | over the 15,000 cap on recount | count text + references + footnotes |
| Live document metadata | author name in file properties | clear properties before export |
| Resubmitting an ASR-rejected paper | not reconsidered | do not resubmit; ASR rejects are final |
An author preps a quantitative inequality paper for Sage Track upload.
Body + references + footnotes: 14,920 words → under 15,000, OK
Abstract: 178 words, no institutions named → under the 200-word ceiling
Files: (1) masked manuscript, no title page; (2) separate title page with affiliations + word count
Masking sweep: 3 self-citations reworded; properties cleared; acknowledgments on title page only
Fee: $25 processing fee ready (verified 2026-06-22; ASA-student waiver applies)Two files, caps verified on a recount including references, and a clean masking sweep — the most common avoidable rejections pre-empted before upload.
argument (hand to asr-writing-style).
metadata; the separate title page is the only place identifiers belong.
most common avoidable cause of a return.
early.
live.
【Type】Article (≤15,000) / Comment-Reply (≤3,000) — cap met? [Y/N]
【Masked】no title page + self-refs neutralized + metadata clean? [Y/N]
【Separate title page】prepared? [Y/N]
【Abstract】word count (≤200), non-identifying?
【Format】double-spaced TNR 12pt + ASA Style Guide (7th ed., 2022)? [Y/N]
【Fee】$25 ready or ASA-student waiver? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → asr-rebuttal on R&R../../resources/external_tools.md — reference managers, masking, repro tooling../../resources/official-source-map.md — official ASR URLs behind every fact in this pack~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.