amanthro-tables-figures — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited amanthro-tables-figures (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
At AA, exhibits do more than display numbers — a photograph, a map, a site plan, a kinship chart, or a film clip can carry the argument, and the Multimodal Anthropologies section treats media as scholarship in its own right. Exhibits also cost words (the Research-Article count includes figures, tables, references, and notes), and they carry ethical and rights obligations that other fields' charts do not.
state place, date, what is shown, sample/N (for quantitative exhibits), and the source.
exhibits that advance the interpretation (a contrast, a spatial pattern, a relational structure).
the consent given (blur or anonymize where required). Do not publish images that expose or endanger interlocutors (see amanthro-transparency-and-data).
credit lines and licenses are correct. Heritage/community rights over images of cultural property and ancestral remains are respected — some images should not be reproduced at all.
carries meaning; legible transcripts with transcription conventions stated.
【Main exhibit】what it shows + why it argues (not decorates)
【Self-contained?】caption + labels + source + date/place present? [Y/N]
【Consent & rights】people consented / permissions secured / heritage respected? [Y/N]
【Accessible?】alt text + grayscale-legible + transcript conventions? [Y/N]
【Word-budget impact】noted (figures/tables count)
【Next】amanthro-writing-style| If your exhibit is… | The first question an AA editor/reviewer asks | The fix that clears it |
|---|---|---|
| A field photograph of people | Did they consent to this image being published? | Consent on file; blur/withhold per the consent; caption with place/date |
| A map or site plan | Does it reveal a protected/sacred location? | Generalize coordinates; consult the community before publishing |
| An artifact plate / museum image | Are permissions and credits secured; is it heritage-sensitive? | Clear rights; respect community authority; some objects are not reproduced |
| An interlinear transcript | Are transcription conventions stated and glosses legible? | State conventions; align glosses; translate fairly |
| A quantitative plot (bio/archaeo) | Does it show uncertainty, and do values match the analysis? | Plot intervals/effect sizes; reconcile numbers to the source |
| A multimodal piece (film/sound) | Does the media argue, with consent and access controls? | Make it carry analytic weight; document consent for the medium |
dignity of the people shown can override the cleanest visualization.
notes), so a decorative image is doubly expensive — drop it or move support to where it argues.
and image descriptions; confirm Research Exchange file prompts before final upload.
../../resources/external_tools.md — mapping/GIS, image, transcription, and plotting tools../../resources/official-source-map.md — alt-text, permissions, and figure requirements~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.