aistats-topic-selection — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited aistats-topic-selection (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Use this before writing. AISTATS is strongest for work at the intersection of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and statistics, especially when statistical reasoning is not merely an evaluation detail.
uncertainty, causal or probabilistic modeling, learning theory, optimization, or empirical methodology with clear AI/ML relevance.
learning, scaling, or deep learning practice with limited statistical novelty.
causality, decision making under uncertainty, or Bayesian reasoning.
is secondary.
proofs, or a statistics audience more than an AI conference audience.
| Signal in the project | AISTATS reading |
|---|---|
| Consistency, minimax rate, regret, or coverage result paired with experiments | Core fit — the house genre |
| Bayesian, causal, kernel, or high-dimensional methodology with guarantees | Core fit |
| Deep architecture with strong benchmarks but thin theory | Better served at NeurIPS, ICML, or ICLR |
| Pure theory with no plausible experiment | COLT or a statistics journal |
| Probabilistic reasoning without a learning angle | UAI or a statistics venue |
A project delivers a debiased lasso variant with valid confidence intervals in high dimensions and simulations confirming coverage. AISTATS reading: strong fit — an inference guarantee plus validating experiments is exactly what this venue rewards. Strip the inference theory and keep only prediction benchmarks, and the same project belongs at a general ML venue; grow it into journal-length asymptotic refinements, and Annals of Statistics or JMLR becomes the better home.
result. If no primitive exists, the AISTATS framing does not exist either.
carry the argument's spine on its own.
decoration-only benchmarks are a quiet fit failure here.
routing.
[Fit] strong AISTATS / possible AISTATS / better elsewhere
[Best venue] AISTATS / NeurIPS / ICML / ICLR / UAI / COLT / journal / other
[Contribution sentence] <one sentence>
[Top rejection risk] <novelty/statistics/evidence/clarity/scope>
[Next action] <theory, experiment, framing, or venue switch>~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.