aerj-submission — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited aerj-submission (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The last check before pressing submit on ScholarOne Manuscript Central. AERJ is masked, so the single most common avoidable failure is an under-anonymized manuscript or identifying metadata. Verify volatile specifics on the official page before relying on them.
flagship journal of AERA.
Institutional Analysis and Teaching, Learning, and Human Development sections, but the integrated AERJ began receiving new manuscripts on July 1, 2015 and publishing on January 1, 2016**. Submit to the single integrated journal; do not pick between the former sections.
figures, notes, and references; 8.5" x 11" paper.
its submission-guidelines page for the reference list (verify against the live guidelines).
— treat as 待核实/需复核 and confirm on the live SAGE author-instructions and AERA journal pages.
aerj-tables-figures)aerj-transparency-and-data-policy)ScholarOne screening and the editors catch avoidable failures before review. This table maps the most common pre-submission errors to their consequence so you can clear each one.
| Failure at upload | What it breaks | Avoidable fix |
|---|---|---|
| Author name in text/metadata | Masked review | Strip identifiers; move them to the title-page file |
| No clear AERJ fit | Editor/reviewer match | Name the dominant education lens and field-wide significance |
| Abstract over the limit | Format compliance | Trim to the stated word range; verify the figure |
| Over-length manuscript | Inclusive page count | Cut to the page limit counting tables/figures/refs |
| Mixed citation styles | APA-7 compliance | Run a single clean author-date pass |
A team is uploading a mixed-methods evaluation of a community-schools initiative to AERJ. The preflight catches three things: an acknowledgments line thanking a named foundation (breaks masking), an abstract of 134 words (illustrative, over a 100–120 target), and a figure note citing "our prior district study" (a self-citation tell). Fixing all three before submission — moving funder thanks to the title page, trimming the abstract to 118 words, neutralizing the self-reference — converts a likely desk return into a clean send-out. Confirm the exact length and abstract limits against the journal's current submission guidelines.
at submission, not after acceptance.
【AERJ fit】dominant lens + field-wide stake stated? [Y/N]
【Masked】text + self-refs + file metadata clean + separate title page? [Y/N]
【Abstract】word count (100–120)
【Length】within limit incl. tables/figures/refs? [Y/N]
【APA 7th + ORCID】[Y/N]
【Reporting + data plan】ready? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → aerj-rebuttal on R&R../../resources/external_tools.md — APA reference managers, anonymization, repro tooling../../resources/official-source-map.md — official AERJ submission facts~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.