aaag-transparency-and-data — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited aaag-transparency-and-data (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The Annals (Taylor & Francis, for the AAG) follows publisher and disciplinary norms for data availability and research integrity rather than (as at some journals) a mandatory, editor-run replication check before publication. The right posture is: document spatial-data provenance thoroughly, share what you ethically can, and protect location privacy. Confirm the current data- availability / sharing policy on the Taylor & Francis journal page (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
Document enough that another geographer could locate, re-project, and rebuild the dataset:
with access dates and terms.
ordered pipeline, not "cleaned in GIS."
(aggregation, jittering, areal reporting) and state the method.
renv.lock / requirements.txt).and an access path; provide synthetic/masked data so code can run where feasible.
Because the Annals spans four areas, the availability expectation lands differently on different evidence. This grid keeps the posture honest; confirm mechanics against the current T&F policy.
| Data type | Typically shareable | Restricted | Provenance to document |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public geospatial (census, OSM) | data + code | none | source, vintage, CRS, join keys |
| Satellite / DEM | processing code + IDs | bulk imagery (host link instead) | sensor, dates, correction, resolution |
| Field GPS of people/sites | masked/aggregated data | exact coordinates | masking method, IRB, consent |
| Interviews / ethnography | coding scheme | identifiable transcripts/locations | anonymization, composite-disclosure note |
| Proprietary/licensed layers | code + access path | the layer itself | license terms, how to obtain |
【Provenance】sources + licenses + CRS + processing log documented? [Y/N]
【Geoprivacy】masking/aggregation for identifiable locations? [Y/N/NA]
【Human subjects】IRB/consent handled? [Y/N/NA]
【Reproducibility】master script + README + seeds + versions? [Y/N]
【Data-availability statement】shared / restricted (why) / access path / synthetic?
【Policy check】current T&F data policy confirmed? [Y/N/待核实]
【Next】aaag-review-process../../resources/external_tools.md — reproducibility tooling, repositories, and geomasking options../../resources/official-source-map.md — T&F data-availability and AAG ethics references~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.