aaag-submission — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited aaag-submission (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The last check before pressing submit on ScholarOne Manuscripts. The Annals is double-anonymous and caps almost everything against the word limit, so the two most common avoidable failures are an under-anonymized manuscript and an over-length one. Verify volatile specifics on the official pages before relying on them (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).
one to three referees, one of which is the editor or a designate. Commentary Responses get single-anonymous review. Anonymize the manuscript; provide a separate title page.
Society; Physical Geography, Earth, and Environmental Sciences — plus a General Geography / cross-disciplinary track. A subject editor leads each area (plus a Cartography Editor), all on four-year terms; your area routes the manuscript. Current area editors (verified 2026-06-22 via AAG announcements): Human Geography — Paul Adams (since Jan 2024); Nature and Society — Brian King (since Jan 2024); General Geography / cross-discipline — Rachel Franklin (since Jan 2025); Physical Geography, Earth & Environmental Sciences — Michaela Buenemann (since Jan 2025); Geographic Methods — Anthony Howell** (since Jan 2026). Re-confirm on the AAG page, as terms rotate.
tables, figure captions); Forum intro 2,500 + papers 5,000 each, ≤ 25,000 total; Commentary < 2,000 incl. references; Special-Issue papers ~5,000 words. (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准)
Francis after acceptance (待核实).
aaag-tables-figuresaaag-transparency-and-data)Double-anonymous review is harder in geography because the study site can identify the author. A single-county study by the only group working there, named field stations, or distinctive local data can de-anonymize as effectively as a name in the header. Mitigations:
Southeast" rather than naming a tiny home county) — or note the unavoidable in the cover letter.
【Area / type】GeogMethods/Human/Nature&Society/Physical-Earth-Env/General-cross · Article/Forum/Commentary/Special-Issue (cap met? Y/N)
【Word count】total incl. abstract/refs/notes/tables/captions vs. cap
【Anonymized】text + self-refs + metadata + study-site detail clean? [Y/N]
【Style】Chicago author-date + 3-5 italicized keywords? [Y/N]
【Data/ethics】geoprivacy + IRB + data-availability statement? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → aaag-rebuttal on revision./templates/checklist.md — copy-paste preflight checklist../../resources/official-source-map.md — official Annals/AAG/Taylor & Francis URLs behind every fact~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.