Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills (Plugin) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
Aggregate score unchanged between these scans.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
<p align="center"> <img src="assets/cover.svg" alt="Journal of Applied Psychology cover" width="200"> </p>
English | 简体中文
Agent skill stack for manuscripts targeted at the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) — the American Psychological Association (APA) flagship of industrial-organizational (I-O) and applied psychology, founded in 1917. JAP publishes work on work motivation, leadership, personnel selection and assessment, teams, job attitudes and well-being, organizational justice, training, and turnover, with a strong micro/individual and measurement emphasis.
This repository is opinionated. It is not a generic psychology-writing toolbox and it is not a relabeled social-science pack. It is JAP-specific: a dual gate of genuine I-O theoretical contribution and measurement/design rigor (construct validity, common-method-variance control, multilevel/nested data), the house quantitative toolkit (lab and field experiments, multi-wave field studies, SEM, HLM, mediation/moderation, meta-analysis), masked (anonymized) review, APA 7th-edition style, and the journal's TOP open-science framework (data, materials, and code availability; preregistration weighed).
Its constraints differ from a general empirical-psychology or management journal:
| Constraint | Journal of Applied Psychology | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| The bar | Theoretical contribution to I-O science _and_ measurement/design rigor | Rigor alone, or theory alone, is a common reject |
| Evidence | Lab/field experiments, multi-wave field studies, SEM, HLM, meta-analysis | Cross-sectional single-source self-report rarely suffices |
| Measurement | Construct validity, reliability, invariance, CMV control | Report measurement before structure |
| Levels | Individual / team / organization; multilevel and cross-level models | Model the nesting (ICC/r_wg); level of analysis is theory |
| Publisher / owner | American Psychological Association (APA) | Submitted via Editorial Manager (/apl); masked review |
| Style | APA 7th edition; structured abstract | Effect sizes + CIs, fit indices, exact p-values |
| Open science | TOP framework (since 1 Nov 2021): data/materials/code + statement | Plan deposits + DOIs before submission; disclose dataset reuse |
| Preregistration | Weighed in evaluation | Preregister well; report it honestly |
| Article types | Feature Article · Research Report · theory-development · review · qualitative · meta-analysis | Pick the right one up front |
Volatile specifics (editor, length caps, abstract limit, exact TOP level/wording, accepted types) change — items not directly confirmed are marked 待核实 in resources/official-source-map.md. Verify on the official page.
Official basis checked 2026-06 (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).
/plugin marketplace add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/journal-of-applied-psychology-skills
/plugin install journal-of-applied-psychology-skills
/reload-pluginsgit clone https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/journal-of-applied-psychology-skills.git
cd journal-of-applied-psychology-skills
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -R skills/joap-* ~/.claude/skills/
# or
mkdir -p ~/.codex/skills && cp -R skills/joap-* ~/.codex/skills/Use joap-workflow to tell me which skill I should use next for my Journal of Applied Psychology manuscript.joap-topic-selection
▼
joap-theory-and-hypotheses (lock the mechanism + levels first)
▼
joap-literature-positioning
▼
joap-study-design (measurement, CMV, nesting; preregister here)
▼
joap-data-analysis (SEM / HLM / mediation / meta-analysis)
▼
joap-tables-figures
▼
joap-writing-style (APA 7th; contribution-forward)
▼
joap-open-science-and-transparency
▼
joap-review-process
▼
joap-submission
▼
joap-rebuttaljoap-workflow is the router. Theory comes before literature positioning here on purpose — JAP wants the mechanism and level of analysis fixed first, then the literature marshaled to show why it is new. For meta-analyses and theory-development articles the spine shifts (pull data-analysis or theory-and-hypotheses forward).
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|---|
joap-workflow | Router — decides which sub-skill to invoke next |
joap-topic-selection | Dual-gate fit (I-O theory + rigor); choose the article type |
joap-theory-and-hypotheses | I-O mechanism, level of analysis, directional + confirmatory hypotheses |
joap-literature-positioning | Stake the contribution vs. the closest prior work; sibling-venue boundary |
joap-study-design | Construct validity, CMV remedies, multilevel/nested design, power |
joap-data-analysis | SEM/CFA, HLM, mediation with bootstrap CIs, meta-analysis, full disclosure |
joap-tables-figures | APA 7th Table 1, path/CFA diagrams, multilevel tables, forest/funnel plots |
joap-writing-style | APA 7th style; contribution-forward arc; structured abstract |
joap-open-science-and-transparency | TOP data/materials/code, data-availability statement, DOIs, prior-use |
joap-review-process | Masked review; the dual gate; action-editor model; desk-reject patterns |
joap-submission | Editorial Manager preflight (style, masking, transparency, exhibits) |
joap-rebuttal | R&R response-letter strategy for multiple reviewers + the action editor |
resources/external_tools.md — SEM/HLM/meta-analysis software (lavaan, Mplus, lme4, metafor/psychmeta), CMV and invariance tools, preregistration (OSF), repositories (OSF/ICPSR/Dataverse/Zenodo), papajaresources/official-source-map.md — official APA URLs behind every fact, with 待核实 markersresources/worked-examples/01-introduction.md — a before→after JAP introduction (fictional teaching paper)resources/exemplars/library.md — real, web-verified JAP papers by method × topic, with a sibling-journal guard| Venue | Center of gravity | How JAP differs |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel Psychology | personnel selection, assessment, validation | JAP leads with a theoretical mechanism, not a validation study |
| Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) | macro/meso management, organizational outcomes | JAP is micro/individual + measurement-focused |
| OBHDP | judgment, decision processes, experimental micro-OB | JAP emphasizes I-O theory + field generalizability + measurement |
| Journal of Organizational Behavior (JOB) | broad OB, overlapping micro topics | JAP holds a stronger measurement/quantitative-rigor bar |
MIT
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.