English-Humanities-Journal-Skills — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited English-Humanities-Journal-Skills (Plugin) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
Aggregate score unchanged between these scans.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
<p align="center"> <img src="assets/cover.svg" alt="English Humanities Journal Skills — 36 flagship humanities journals" width="220"> </p>
English | 简体中文
An opinionated agent skill stack for 36 flagship English-language humanities journals — the category the existing breadth bundles leave thin. It covers the leading venues in history (The American Historical Review, Past & Present, The Journal of Modern History), philosophy (The Philosophical Review, Mind, Noûs, Ethics, Philosophy & Public Affairs), literary studies (PMLA, Critical Inquiry, New Literary History, Representations), classics (The Classical Quarterly, The Journal of Roman Studies), art and architectural history (The Art Bulletin, Art History, October, The Burlington Magazine), religious studies, linguistics (Language, Linguistic Inquiry), and musicology and aesthetics.
This is the humanities sibling of English-SocialScience-Journal-Skills and English-NaturalScience-Journal-Skills. Like them, it ships one self-contained fit-and-house-style skill per journal, plus en-humanities-journal-workflow for routing. Each journal skill helps answer: is my argument on-target for this venue, how should it be framed, what command of sources and which theoretical idiom does it expect, and what official submission details (article type, citation style, anonymization, image permissions) must be re-checked?
Several of these flagships also ship as first-party depth packs in the parent repo (The Art Bulletin, Critical Inquiry, PMLA, Mind, The American Historical Review); they are covered here as quick fit cards too — exactly as american-economic-review is covered both ways.
| Group | Count |
|---|---|
| History | 7 |
| Philosophy | 7 |
| Literary studies | 6 |
| Classics | 2 |
| Art & architectural history | 4 |
| Religious studies | 3 |
| Linguistics | 4 |
| Musicology & aesthetics | 3 |
| Total journal skills | 36 |
Routing workflow (en-humanities-journal-workflow) | 1 |
en-humanities-journal-workflow to classify yourmanuscript by sub-field, contribution type, and approach, and get a ranked shortlist.
fit, argument framing, source/evidence expectations, the theoretical idiom, house style, and the likely desk-reject triggers.
checklist. Before submitting, open the journal's current submission guidelines and style sheet (see resources/official-source-map.md) — the live page always wins, and presses/styles do change.
or editor names.
claims about specific articles or a living scholar's positions.
field citation styles — Chicago / MLA / discipline styles, double-blind review, image permissions) are used where they help fit.
official instruction.
MIT © 2026 Bryce Wang. See LICENSE.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.