Chinese-Public-Administration-Skills — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited Chinese-Public-Administration-Skills (Plugin) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
Aggregate score unchanged between these scans.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
<p align="center"> <img src="assets/cover.svg" alt="《中国行政管理》 journal cover" width="220"> </p>
English | 简体中文
Agent skill stack for manuscripts targeted at 《中国行政管理》 (Chinese Public Administration) — a leading CSSCI journal sponsored by the Chinese Public Administration Society and one of the most authoritative outlets in China's public administration and governance field.
This repository is opinionated. It is not a generic Chinese social-science writing toolbox. It is a Chinese-Public-Administration-specific stack covering governance-theory topic selection, bilingual literature review, mixed quantitative-qualitative research design and causal inference, governance / policy-process mechanism analysis, cross-context heterogeneity, CSSCI house style, grounded-yet-actionable policy implications, and review-response rebuttals.
《中国行政管理》 imposes constraints that differ materially from economics journals (such as 《经济研究》) and from international PA journals (JPART / PAR / Governance):
| Constraint | Chinese Public Administration | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Discipline | Public administration / governance / public policy | Pure-economics or pure-management papers are off-fit |
| Theory anchor | A PA theory frame is required (governance, NPM / NPS, policy-process) | "Data + regression only" reads as off-discipline |
| Method pluralism | Quantitative and qualitative both first-class | Normative, case, comparative, and empirical designs all OK |
| Research-question fit | Method must match the question, not the fashion | A quasi-experiment grafted onto a governance question fails |
| China governance reality | Topic must be anchored in real Chinese governance practice | Abstract "global" framing without China context reads thin |
| Mechanism | Governance / policy-process mechanism expected | "Effect without process" is weak for a PA reviewer |
| Policy implications | More actionable than economics journals, but must rest on analysis | The "强化/完善/健全/推进" four-verb filler is a reject signal |
| Length & exhibits | Full-structure Chinese article; figures / tables as needed | Working-paper-style fragments are off-fit |
| Abstract | Concise Chinese abstract; question → method → finding → significance | Empty-significance opening reads as filler |
Generic "social-science writing" or "economics writing" skill packs do not address these constraints.
/plugin marketplace add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills
/plugin install chinese-public-administration-skills
/reload-pluginsgit clone https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills.git
cd awesome-journal-skills/Chinese-Public-Administration-Skills
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -R skills/cpa-* ~/.claude/skills/
# or
mkdir -p ~/.codex/skills && cp -R skills/cpa-* ~/.codex/skills/Use cpa-workflow to tell me which skill I should use next for my Chinese-Public-Administration manuscript.cpa-topic-selection
▼
cpa-literature-review
▼
cpa-identification (research design: quant / qual / normative)
▼
cpa-mechanism
▼
cpa-heterogeneity
▼
cpa-tables-figures
▼
cpa-policy-implication
▼
cpa-abstract (polish)
▼
cpa-style (polish)
▼
cpa-submission
▼
cpa-rebuttalcpa-workflow is the router — it tells you which skill to use next based on where you are.
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|---|
cpa-workflow | Router — decides which sub-skill to invoke next |
cpa-topic-selection | Governance-theory fit + research-question + contribution framing |
cpa-literature-review | Bilingual PA-theory + China-governance literature structure |
cpa-identification | Research design: quant (survey / admin data / DID-IV-RDD) + qual (case / process-tracing / grounded theory) + normative |
cpa-mechanism | Governance / policy-process mechanism (implementation, attention, central-local, incentives) |
cpa-heterogeneity | Cross-region / level / governance-context conditionality |
cpa-tables-figures | Three-line tables, coding tables, process diagrams, exhibits |
cpa-policy-implication | Actionable-but-grounded implications for government practice |
cpa-abstract | Concise Chinese / English abstract + blacklist-phrase removal |
cpa-style | Language polish: four-verb filler → grounded analytical claims |
cpa-submission | Pre-submission checklist + manuscript template (format, anonymity) |
cpa-rebuttal | Review-response letter structure |
skills/cpa-submission/templates/manuscript_template.md — Standard PA manuscript skeleton (abstract, theory frame, design, coding / variable table, references)skills/cpa-submission/templates/checklist.md — 8-section pre-submission self-checkresources/external_tools.md — Chinese public-administration data sources (CGSS / CFPS / government open data / policy-document corpora) + Stata / Python / R / NVivo packages| Dimension | Chinese Public Administration | Economic Research |
|---|---|---|
| Discipline | Public administration / governance | Economics (macro / institutional) |
| Method | Mixed quant + qual, normative welcome | Quantitative causal inference |
| Theory anchor | Governance / NPM-NPS / policy process | Economic theory |
| Policy framing | Actionable for government practice, grounded | Significance / institutional |
| Case / qualitative | First-class | Rarely accepted |
MIT
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.