China-Economic-Quarterly-Skills — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited China-Economic-Quarterly-Skills (Plugin) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
Aggregate score unchanged between these scans.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
<p align="center"> <img src="assets/cover.svg" alt="《经济学(季刊)》 journal cover" width="220"> </p>
-c0392b)](https://www.nsd.pku.edu.cn/cbw/jjxjk/index.htm)
English | 简体中文
Agent skill stack for manuscripts targeted at 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) — the Peking University / CCER (now National School of Development) journal that sits closest to international top-field economics standards among Chinese-language outlets (founded 2001; six issues per year since 2021; ISSN 2095-1086; CN 11-6010/F).
This repository is opinionated. It is not a generic econometrics toolbox. It is a CEQ-specific stack built around the journal's defining bar: credible identification + international legibility over everything else. CEQ is the strictest Chinese economics journal on methodology, and the least tolerant of policy sloganeering.
Verified journal facts live in resources/journal-profile.md with source links.
CEQ imposes constraints that differ from sibling Chinese econ journals (经济研究 / 中国工业经济 / 金融研究 / 世界经济):
| Constraint | China Economic Quarterly | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Paradigm | International top-field; reviewers overseas-trained | "国内实证套路" framing reads as dated |
| Identification | Structural OR clean quasi-experiment | OLS + controls as causal gets desk-rejected |
| Modern DID | Staggered/heterogeneity batteries mandatory | Bare TWFE on staggered timing is a reject |
| Inference | Clustering rationale, weak-IV-robust, multiple testing | Default robust SEs are not enough |
| Contribution | Benchmarked to specific field papers | "丰富了相关研究" is not a contribution |
| Exhibits | Figures over tables (event-study / bin-scatter) | Table-only results under-sell the design |
| Abstract | English abstract ≤ 100 words, must read to field peers | Many readers only read the English abstract + figures |
| Citations | In-text author-date (页内夹注), 3 JEL codes | Footnote-style citation is off-format |
| Skill | Role |
|---|---|
ceq-workflow | Router — which skill next |
ceq-fit-positioning | Is this on-target for CEQ? Re-route if not |
ceq-topic-selection | Clean causal / model-able / internationally-legible topics |
ceq-literature-review | Precise contribution vs. specific field papers; 中英文献 |
ceq-identification | Structural OR quasi-experiment; assumptions made explicit |
ceq-modern-did | Staggered / heterogeneous treatment-effect compliance |
ceq-inference | Clustering, weak-IV-robust, multiple testing, standard errors |
ceq-mechanism | Channel / mechanism evidence |
ceq-figures | Event-study / bin-scatter / model-fit — figures over tables |
ceq-abstract-english | English abstract + field-benchmarked contribution statement |
ceq-submission | Preflight: system, format, reproducibility, anonymity |
ceq-rebuttal | R&R response letter |
/plugin marketplace add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills
/plugin install china-economic-quarterly-skills
/reload-pluginsmkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -R skills/ceq-* ~/.claude/skills/
# or
mkdir -p ~/.codex/skills && cp -R skills/ceq-* ~/.codex/skills/Editorial policy and publication frequency evolve (the title says "季刊" but CEQ has run six issues per year since 2021). Treat these skills as opinionated heuristics, not official policy — always confirm against the journal's latest 投稿须知 at nsd.pku.edu.cn/cbw/jjxjk and the facts in resources/journal-profile.md.~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.