American-Educational-Research-Journal-Skills — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited American-Educational-Research-Journal-Skills (Plugin) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
<p align="center"> <img src="assets/cover.svg" alt="American Educational Research Journal cover" width="220"> </p>
English | 简体中文
Agent skill stack for manuscripts targeted at the American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) — the flagship journal of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), founded in 1964 and published by SAGE. AERJ publishes original peer-reviewed analyses that span the whole field of education research — across all subfields, all levels of education and the lifespan, and all forms of learning — using quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods alike.
What makes AERJ structurally distinct is its integrated, field-wide remit. AERJ formerly used separate SIA/TLHD sections, but AERA integrated the journal for new manuscripts in 2015. Current submissions should not be routed by former section labels; they should show why the question matters across education research, whether the dominant lens is policy/institutions, teaching/learning, human development, or a cross-cutting design.
This repository is opinionated. It is not a generic social-science writing toolbox and it is not an economics or psychology pack repurposed for education. It is an AERJ-specific stack: a question of broad significance to education research, framed for the integrated AERJ audience, an argument anchored in a conceptual or theoretical framework, a design defended on its own methodological terms (quant / qual / mixed), masked preparation in APA 7th-edition style, and reporting that meets the AERA Standards for Reporting on Empirical Social Science Research.
AERJ's constraints differ from a narrow specialty journal or a methods journal:
| Constraint | AERJ | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Whole field of education research, all levels and methods | The paper must matter beyond one subfield |
| Structure | Integrated field-wide journal (former SIA/TLHD split ended for new submissions in 2015) | Frame the dominant education lens clearly |
| Premium on | Broad significance + a clear conceptual/theoretical framework | A narrow, descriptive-only result is off-fit |
| Methods | Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods — judged on their own terms | Do not force one template onto every paper |
| Publisher / owner | SAGE / AERA | Submitted via ScholarOne Manuscript Central |
| Review model | Masked (anonymous) | Anonymize the manuscript; names only on the title page file |
| Fee | No fee to publish or submit stated; SAGE Choice gold OA available for a fee | Do not budget a submission fee; verify OA terms |
| Length | Manuscripts maximum 50 pages (double-spaced, 12-pt, 1" margins, inclusive) | Plan length including tables, figures, notes, references |
| Abstract | 100–120 words | Tight, structured abstract |
| Style | APA 7th edition (author-date) | Not Chicago/AERA-house; ORCID for the corresponding author |
| Reporting standards | AERA reporting standards (empirical social science; humanities companion) | Report against the standard that matches your method |
Volatile specifics (editor roster, SAGE Choice fee, portal behavior, policy wording) change. Verify on the official SAGE/AERA pages before upload.
/plugin marketplace add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills
/plugin install aerj-skills
/reload-pluginsgit clone https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills.git
cd awesome-journal-skills/American-Educational-Research-Journal-Skills
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -R skills/aerj-* ~/.claude/skills/
# or
mkdir -p ~/.codex/skills && cp -R skills/aerj-* ~/.codex/skills/Use aerj-workflow to tell me which skill I should use next for my AERJ manuscript.aerj-topic-selection (field-wide fit)
▼
aerj-literature-positioning
▼
aerj-theory-and-framework
▼
aerj-research-design (quant / qual / mixed)
▼
aerj-data-analysis
▼
aerj-tables-figures
▼
aerj-writing-style (polish)
▼
aerj-transparency-and-data-policy
▼
aerj-review-process
▼
aerj-submission
▼
aerj-rebuttalaerj-workflow is the router — it tells you which skill to use next based on where you are and whether the dominant education lens and field-wide contribution are clear. If your design is prospective, route to aerj-research-design early to consider preregistration; if your contribution is conceptual or methodological, lean on aerj-theory-and-framework and aerj-literature-positioning.
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|---|
aerj-workflow | Router — decides which sub-skill to invoke next; flags AERJ fit |
aerj-topic-selection | Broad-significance fit across the field; name the dominant education lens |
aerj-literature-positioning | Speak past your subfield; engage the literatures AERJ readers expect |
aerj-theory-and-framework | Build the conceptual / theoretical framework that frames the contribution |
aerj-research-design | Defend the design — quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods in education |
aerj-data-analysis | Analysis norms (multilevel, IRT, qual coding), uncertainty, robustness |
aerj-tables-figures | Accessible, self-contained exhibits in APA 7th-edition format |
aerj-writing-style | APA 7th edition; reach the whole field within the length limit |
aerj-transparency-and-data-policy | AERA reporting standards; data availability; qualitative transparency |
aerj-review-process | Masked review, desk screening, field-wide fit, decision categories |
aerj-submission | ScholarOne preflight (masking, length, abstract, APA, ORCID, title page) |
aerj-rebuttal | R&R response-letter strategy for multiple reviewers + the handling editor |
resources/external_tools.md — education-research data sources (NCES / ECLS / NAEP / SEDA / PISA / TIMSS / state SLDS / QDR) + R / Stata / Mplus / HLM and qualitative/CAQDAS toolingresources/official-source-map.md — official AERA / SAGE URLs behind current process factsMIT
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.