Administrative-Science-Quarterly-Skills — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited Administrative-Science-Quarterly-Skills (Plugin) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
<p align="center"> <img src="assets/cover.svg" alt="Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) cover" width="220"> </p>
English | 简体中文
Agent skill stack for manuscripts targeted at Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) — a top, theory-driven journal in organization theory and the sociology of organizations, published by SAGE in association with the Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management at Cornell University.
This repository is opinionated. It is not a generic management-writing toolbox. It is an ASQ-specific stack built around the journal's hallmark: a deep, often surprising theoretical insight about organizations, delivered with superb craft. ASQ publishes both rigorous quantitative work and rich qualitative/inductive studies (grounded-theory, ethnographic, historical) — and this stack treats both as first-class, because at ASQ method follows the theoretical question.
ASQ imposes constraints that differ materially from AMJ / SMJ / Organization Science:
| Constraint | Administrative Science Quarterly | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Discipline | Organization theory & sociology of organizations | Pure micro-cognition or pure-finance questions are off-fit |
| What's rewarded | A surprising theoretical insight about organizations | A solid-but-unsurprising finding reads as "so what?" |
| Contribution | Theoretical, not methodological | A sophisticated method cannot rescue a thin idea |
| Method stance | Qualitative and quantitative both first-class | Method must follow the question, not the reverse |
| Qualitative bar | Transparent coding, theoretical sampling, data-to-theory tables | "Anecdotal" quotes without rigor are rejected |
| Quantitative bar | Rigorous design, identification, robustness | Cross-sectional same-source causal claims are punished |
| Theory form | Process theory is common; match form to phenomenon | Variance-speak on a process question is a mismatch |
| Craft & narrative | Long-form articles; strong storytelling; superb prose | "Lab-report" writing underperforms |
| Review process | Developmental, multi-round | Expect deep reviews and 2+ revision rounds |
| Scope extras | Also publishes book reviews | Choose the correct manuscript type |
Generic "scientific writing" or "management writing" skill packs do not address these constraints.
/plugin marketplace add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills
/plugin install asq-skills
/reload-pluginsgit clone https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills.git
cd awesome-journal-skills/Administrative-Science-Quarterly-Skills
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -R skills/asq-* ~/.claude/skills/
# or
mkdir -p ~/.codex/skills && cp -R skills/asq-* ~/.codex/skills/Use asq-workflow to tell me which skill I should use next for my ASQ manuscript.asq-topic-selection
▼
asq-theory-development
▼
asq-literature-positioning
▼
asq-methods
▼
asq-data-analysis
▼
asq-contribution-framing
▼
asq-tables-figures
▼
asq-writing-style (polish)
▼
asq-submission
▼
asq-review-process
▼
asq-rebuttalasq-workflow is the router — it tells you which skill to use next based on where you are.
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|---|
asq-workflow | Router — decides which sub-skill to invoke next |
asq-topic-selection | Puzzle/surprise fit test + contribution-claim template |
asq-theory-development | Process vs. variance theory; generative mechanism; boundary conditions |
asq-literature-positioning | Join a specific organization-theory conversation, not survey a field |
asq-methods | Design choice + rigor bar for qualitative and quantitative work |
asq-data-analysis | Data-to-theory link (coding/evidence tables) or estimation + robustness |
asq-contribution-framing | Sharpen the theoretical "so what"; name the contribution type |
asq-tables-figures | Data-structure figures, data-to-theory tables, process models, regressions |
asq-writing-style | Narrative arc, process voice, craft to ASQ's prose bar |
asq-submission | Pre-submission preflight + manuscript template (fit, anonymization, format) |
asq-review-process | Navigate ASQ's developmental, multi-round review |
asq-rebuttal | R&R response-letter structure (deepen the contribution) |
skills/asq-submission/templates/manuscript_template.md — Qualitative and quantitative manuscript skeletonsskills/asq-submission/templates/checklist.md — 8-section pre-submission self-checkresources/external_tools.md — Qualitative CAQDAS + quantitative software, network/historical tools, reference managers, ScholarOne notes| Dimension | ASQ | AMJ | AMR | SMJ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core deliverable | Surprising theory + craft | Empirical contribution | Pure theory | Strategy contribution |
| Data | Qualitative and quantitative | Mostly quantitative | None | Mostly quantitative |
| Theory form | Process common | Variance/hypothesis-testing | Conceptual | Variance/performance |
| Writing | Long-form narrative; craft-heavy | Structured empirical | Argument-driven | Structured empirical |
| Review | Developmental, multi-round | Developmental | Developmental | Developmental |
If the manuscript is purely conceptual with no data, an AMR-style stack fits better. If it is a hypothesis-test with no theoretical surprise, reconsider whether ASQ is the right home.
MIT
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.