aer-submission — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited aer-submission (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The final submission audit catches the formatting and routing mistakes that produce avoidable desk rejections. AER's editorial office returns submissions for non-compliance with length, format, or policy requirements before the editor sees the paper — a turnaround that can cost weeks.
This skill is the last gate.
| Item | AER | AER: Insights |
|---|---|---|
| Abstract length | ≤ 100 words | ≤ 100 words |
| Main text length | ~40 pages (11-pt, 1.5-spaced, 1" margins) | ≤ 7,000 words minus 200 per exhibit; ≤ 6,000 with five exhibits |
| Maximum exhibits | No formal cap | 5; each exhibit reduces budget by 200 words |
| Word-count basis | Page guideline includes figures, tables, references, and in-paper appendices | Main body, footnotes, endnotes, and in-paper appendices; excludes references, exhibits, and Supplemental Appendix |
| File format | Single PDF for review | Single PDF for review |
| Separate title page | None — title and byline on page 1 | Same |
| Cover letter | Optional | Optional |
| Submission system | ScholarOne (mc.manuscriptcentral.com/aer) | ScholarOne |
Manuscripts exceeding AER: Insights length are returned without review. This is enforced automatically.
The 40-page guideline counts:
The 40-page count does not include: title, abstract, supplemental appendix, online appendix.
If over 40 pages: cut, then cut again, then move material to the online appendix. AER editors explicitly state that excessive online-appendix reliance is itself a desk-rejection signal. The supplemental appendix is for additional material, not for the main result.
Count main-body words including footnotes, endnotes, and in-paper appendices; exclude title, byline, abstract, acknowledgement footnote, references, exhibits, and Supplemental Appendix. Word-count discipline:
If you cannot fit, the paper is an AER (or AEJ) paper, not an AER: Insights paper.
[Title]
[Authors and affiliations]
[Abstract — ≤ 100 words]
[JEL codes]
[Keywords]
[Introductory paragraphs — NO heading "Introduction"]
\section{Data} (or whatever the next titled section is)
\section{...}
...
\section{Conclusion}
\bibliography{...}
[Tables in numerical order]
[Figures in numerical order]
\appendix
\section{...} (in-paper appendix only — short)AER numbers sections with Roman numerals (I., II., III.) and subsections with capital letters (A., B., C.); the introduction is unnumbered. In LaTeX, set \renewcommand{\thesection}{\Roman{section}} or use the AEA sample article class, which applies house style automatically.
Move long appendices to a separate Supplemental Appendix file.
Prepare in advance:
If the paper has supplementary materials (videos, large datasets), provide URLs to a public repository.
AER does not require a cover letter. Use one only to communicate substantive information:
If you include one, keep it ≤ 200 words and submit via the ScholarOne form field, not as a separate uploaded document.
Do not use the cover letter to:
Run this decision tree before submission:
Is the contribution sharp enough to fit the AER: Insights word/exhibit formula?
├── Yes → Is it cross-subfield interest?
│ ├── Yes → AER: Insights
│ └── No → AEJ: Applied / Policy / Macro / Micro (by subfield)
└── No → Does it have broad cross-subfield interest?
├── Yes → AER
└── No → AEJ (most fitting)Common mistakes:
AER charges a submission fee that scales with AEA membership status and country income group. Authors from low- and middle-income countries pay reduced or waived fees. Verify current fee schedule on the AEA submissions page before the corresponding author finalizes the form.
aer-consistency audit reports all-pass on the final PDF's sourceaer-referee-sim verdict is at least major R&R on a fresh runBundled with the installed skill, no repository checkout needed --- read it before the repo resources below:
references/final-audit-checklist.md --- desk-rejection no-go audit, length accounting, portal checklistWhen working from the AER-skills repository or plugin bundle, load only the relevant resource:
docs/desk-rejection-audit.mddocs/source-register.mdskills/aer-replication/SKILL.mdexamples/replication-package-skeleton/TARGET VENUE: <AER | AER:Insights | AEJ:...>
LENGTH AUDIT: <pass / fail with details>
FORMAT AUDIT: <pass / fail with details>
COVER LETTER: <none / drafted, <n> words>
DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS: <complete / missing>
CONFLICTS DISCLOSED: <list / none>
REPLICATION DEPOSIT STATUS: <planned / drafted / complete>
READY TO SUBMIT: <yes / no — with blockers>
NEXT SKILL: <none — submit | aer-rebuttal once decision arrives>~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.