Skill Creator

Meta-skill that scaffolds new skills for the ValarMindSkills repository following project conventions.

When to Use

• User asks to create, scaffold, or add a new skill to this repository
• User wants to convert an existing prompt, workflow, or playbook into a reusable skill
• User wants to refactor a long SKILL.md into a skill plus references/ files

Do not use when

• User wants to edit an existing skill — open the file directly
• User wants to install skills — use scripts/install-plugin-claude.sh or scripts/install-antigravity.sh
• User wants to rebuild the plugin itself (.claude-plugin/, hooks/) — that is a separate concern; this skill scaffolds skill content only

Goal

Produce a complete, idiomatic skill under skills/<slug>/ that:

1. Follows one of the five project archetypes (Procedural, Lifecycle, Expert Profile, Best Practices, Reference)
2. Uses only the project's frontmatter convention (name, description, source)
3. Passes every item of references/CHECKLIST.md before the turn ends
4. Has its prompt content audited by @prompt-engineering for clarity, anti-hallucination, and token economy before being reported to the user

This skill scaffolds the structure; @prompt-engineering hardens the content. The two are paired: scaffold first (Steps 1–8), audit the prompt (Step 9), then validate structure (Step 10) and report (Step 11).

Inputs you must collect before starting

If any required input is missing, stop and ask before scaffolding.

Procedure

Step 1 — Discovery

Run, in order:

ls skills/                     # existing slugs — avoid collisions
cat README.md                  # project format and contribution rules
cat CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null      # agent-facing instructions

Pick one or two existing skills closest in purpose to the new one and read their SKILL.md. Cite their paths back to the user as reference models.

Step 2 — Archetype decision

Apply the decision matrix from references/ARCHETYPES.md:

Pick exactly one archetype and state it explicitly before moving on. Full signals and counter-signals live in references/ARCHETYPES.md.

Step 3 — Naming and slug

• Use kebab-case, lowercase, ≤ 64 characters
• Must NOT contain anthropic or claude (Anthropic spec)
• Prefer a noun or noun-phrase (code-review, not review-the-code)
• Verify no collision with ls skills/

If the requested name violates any rule, stop and propose an alternative before scaffolding.

Step 4 — Scaffold files

Create:

skills/<slug>/
└── SKILL.md

Add the rest conditionally:

• references/FILE.md — one or more — when the body would exceed ~400 lines, when there is multi-framework or multi-language branching, or when there is a dense catalog to document. File names are UPPERCASE.md.
• EXAMPLE.md — when the output format is variable, when a canonical example is pedagogical, or when the archetype is Procedural with nontrivial output.
• Never create a scripts/ folder inside the skill — it is not a project convention. See references/STRUCTURE.md.

Step 5 — Write the frontmatter

Use the minimal project frontmatter:

---
name: <slug>
description: "<third-person sentence with trigger phrases, ≤ 1024 characters>"
source: ValarMindSkills
---

Rules enforced by references/FRONTMATTER.md:

• description written in the third person ("Use when the user asks...")
• Include explicit trigger phrases (PT and EN when the user writes in both)
• Do not invent fields. Anthropic-official fields like when_to_use, allowed-tools, disable-model-invocation are listed for reference only and are not used in this repository

Step 6 — Write the body

Follow the archetype skeleton from references/ARCHETYPES.md. Target sections, in order:

• Procedural: Goal → Inputs → Procedure (numbered steps) → Constraints → Output format → Example request
• Lifecycle: When to Use → Prerequisites → Phase 0…N → Constraints
• Expert Profile: Use when / Do not use → Expert Purpose → Capabilities → Behavioral Traits → Knowledge Base → Response Approach → Example Interactions
• Best Practices: When to Use → Core Concepts → Detailed Topics → Practical Guidance → Examples → Guidelines
• Reference: Purpose → Schema → Themed subsections → Tables → Code/YAML literals → Pointers to references/

For every axis the caller might want to override via extra prompt text (/my-skill in Spanish, /my-skill verbose), add an explicit row in Inputs with Required: No and a default. Rules that must survive adversarial extras go in Constraints using absolute verbs (Never, Must not). See references/EXTRA_INSTRUCTIONS.md for the full pattern catalog.

Hard budget: keep the SKILL.md body under 500 lines. If you exceed it, move detail into references/.

Step 7 — Write references/ (if applicable)

One topic per file. Open each reference with a one-line companion banner:

> Reference companion for the [<slug>](../SKILL.md) skill.

Link from SKILL.md using relative paths: [label](references/FILE.md). Do not link across skills with relative paths — use @<slug> text references instead.

Step 8 — Write EXAMPLE.md (if applicable)

Keep it minimal and self-contained: one canonical input and one canonical output, no more. See skills/github-commit/EXAMPLE.md and skills/github-pr-review/EXAMPLE.md for the two dominant shapes (code blocks vs. worked document).

Step 9 — Audit prompt content with @prompt-engineering

Mandatory step before validation. The previous steps produce a structurally correct skill — @prompt-engineering hardens the content of the prompt against the failure modes that scaffolding alone does not catch (vague success criteria, hallucination floors missing, silent omissions, redundant pleasantries, safety rules weakened during edits).

Run the audit in this order:

1. Treat the just-written SKILL.md as input.
2. Classify the prompt: role: skill, use case: skill. The @prompt-engineering skill loads its USE_CASES.md §1 skeleton and findings catalog automatically when this classification is set.
3. Walk Phase 0–6 of @prompt-engineering against the draft. Every Critical and Major finding is a blocker; Minor findings are reported but do not block.
4. Apply the proposed rewrite (Block 3 of the audit output) only with user approval. @prompt-engineering is read-only; this skill mediates the apply step.
5. Record the post-audit metrics in the Step 11 report: clarity score, anti-hallucination coverage, token delta, overall risk tag.

If @prompt-engineering is unavailable (skill not installed in the current session), skip this step and surface the gap explicitly in Step 11 (prompt audit: skipped — @prompt-engineering not available). Do not silently omit the audit.

Step 10 — Validation

Walk through references/CHECKLIST.md item by item. Do not skip. If any item fails, fix it before reporting to the user. The "Prompt audit" section of the checklist verifies Step 9 ran and its findings were addressed.

Quick YAML sanity check:

python3 -c "import yaml; d=open('skills/<slug>/SKILL.md').read().split('---'); yaml.safe_load(d[1])"

Step 11 — Report to user

Deliver the report in the format below, then suggest updating README.md to add the new skill to the "Available skills" table.

Constraints

• Markdown and YAML only — no executable scripts inside skills/<slug>/
• All prose in English (per README §Contributing). Only trigger phrases in the description may be bilingual
• description ≤ 1024 characters, name ≤ 64 characters, body < 500 lines
• Never include anthropic or claude in the name or description
• Never invent frontmatter fields beyond what references/FRONTMATTER.md documents
• Always cite at least one canonical example path from the repository when guiding archetype choice
• Always run Step 9 (`@prompt-engineering` audit) before Step 10. Skipping the audit is a regression even when scaffolding looks complete.
• Never apply the `@prompt-engineering` rewrite without explicit user approval. The audit is read-only; this skill mediates the apply step on the user's behalf.
• Never report a skill as ready when `@prompt-engineering` returned blocking findings (Critical or Major). Resolve them or surface them with prompt audit: blocked — <count> Critical/Major findings unresolved.
• Never commit without the user's explicit approval

Output format

After creation, report exactly:

Created skills/<slug>/
  SKILL.md         (<N> lines, archetype: <X>)
  references/<FILE>.md  (<N> lines)       [if any]
  EXAMPLE.md       (<N> lines)            [if any]

Frontmatter:
  name: <slug>
  source: ValarMindSkills
  description: <first 120 chars…>

Prompt audit (@prompt-engineering):
  clarity:                <N>/8 axes pass
  anti-hallucination:     <N>/12 strategies covered
  token delta:            <signed Δ tokens>
  risk tag (overall):     SAFE | REVIEW | BREAKING
  blocking findings:      <count>  (resolved before report)

Install:
  bash scripts/install-plugin-claude.sh   # Claude Code CLI (plugin valarmindskills@valarmindskills)
  bash scripts/install-all.sh             # Claude Code + Antigravity

Invoke:
  /valarmindskills:<slug>

Then offer to update README.md and, if the user agrees, add the new row to the "Available skills" table.

Example request

See EXAMPLE.md for a worked end-to-end creation of hello-skill.

Typical activating phrases:

• "Crie uma skill nova para auditar docker-compose"
• "Scaffold a skill that generates OpenAPI specs from Go handlers"
• "Adicionar uma skill para revisar migrations"
• "Help me design a SKILL.md for a changelog summarizer"

Related Skills

• @prompt-engineering — paired sibling. Audits the prompt content of the just-scaffolded SKILL.md (Step 9) before validation. Scaffold first, audit second.

References

• ARCHETYPES — the five archetypes, decision matrix, and canonical examples
• FRONTMATTER — YAML field reference (project + official Anthropic comparison)
• STRUCTURE — directory layout, naming rules, progressive disclosure, anti-patterns
• EXTRA_INSTRUCTIONS — how skills consume free-form overrides after invocation, precedence rules, Inputs/Constraints patterns
• CHECKLIST — final validation before handing the skill back to the user (includes the prompt-audit checklist section)