bio-manuscript-refine — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited bio-manuscript-refine (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Refine loop: three-reviewer iterative refinement (三审稿人迭代优化)
Run a reviewer-style refinement loop over the manuscript plan using three perspectives: editor, computational reviewer, and biological reviewer.
manuscript_plan: [full manuscript plan generated in previous steps]
target_journal: [target journal, default nat-communications]
num_rounds: [number of refine rounds, default 2]Produce three reviews:
Then generate:
# Refine Report
## Round 0
- initial proposal snapshot
## Round 1 Reviews
### Editor
- scores:
- key concerns:
### Computational Reviewer
- scores:
- key concerns:
### Biological Reviewer
- scores:
- key concerns:
## Round 1 Revision
- addressed concerns:
- remaining risks:
## Score History
| Round | Editor | Computational | Biological | Overall |
|-------|--------|---------------|------------|---------|
| 0 | ... | ... | ... | ... |
## Final Proposal Status
- ready for next phase / needs more revision/bio-manuscript-refine "manuscript_plan: [path to proposal] | target_journal: nat-communications | num_rounds: 2"~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.