bio-human-feedback — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited bio-human-feedback (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Phase 2.6: Human review checkpoint (人类反馈验证)
Present the refined proposal to a human reviewer, collect feedback, and decide whether to continue or loop back for revision.
FINAL_PROPOSAL.md# Proposal Review - Round X
## Innovation Summary
- ...
## Figure Overview
- Figure 1:
- Figure 2:
## Experimental Plan
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Baseline |
|------|---------|--------|----------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
## Key Decisions Requiring Human Approval
1. ...
2. ...
## Reviewer Summary
| Reviewer | Score / status | Main advice |
|----------|----------------|-------------|
| Editor | ... | ... |
| Computational | ... | ... |
| Biological | ... | ... |
## Human Decision
- Approve and continue
- Request revisionsrefine-logs/human-feedback/feedback-round-X.mdrefine-logs/HUMAN_APPROVAL.md/bio-human-feedback --round 2 --proposal refine-logs/FINAL_PROPOSAL.md~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.