capture-tasks-from-meeting-notes — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited capture-tasks-from-meeting-notes (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
meeting notes, action items, create tasks, create tickets, extract tasks, parse notes, analyze notes, assigned work, assignees, from meeting, post-meeting, capture tasks, generate tasks, turn into tasks, convert to tasks, action item, to-do, task list, follow-up, assigned to, create Jira tasks, create Jira tickets, meeting action items, extract action items, find action items, analyze meeting
Automatically extract action items from meeting notes and create Jira tasks with proper assignees. This skill parses unstructured meeting notes (from Confluence or pasted text), identifies action items with assignees, looks up Jira account IDs, and creates tasks—eliminating the tedious post-meeting ticket creation process.
Use this skill when: Users have meeting notes with action items that need to become Jira tasks.
Follow this 7-step process to turn meeting notes into actionable Jira tasks:
Obtain the meeting notes from the user.
#### Option A: Confluence Page URL
If user provides a Confluence URL:
getConfluencePage(
cloudId="...",
pageId="[extracted from URL]",
contentFormat="markdown"
)URL patterns:
https://[site].atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/[SPACE]/pages/[PAGE_ID]/[title]getAccessibleAtlassianResources#### Option B: Pasted Text
If user pastes meeting notes directly:
#### If Unclear
Ask: "Do you have a Confluence link to the meeting notes, or would you like to paste them directly?"
Scan the notes for action items with assignees.
#### Common Patterns
Pattern 1: @mention format (highest priority)
@Sarah to create user stories for chat feature
@Mike will update architecture docPattern 2: Name + action verb
Sarah to create user stories
Mike will update architecture doc
Lisa should review the mockupsPattern 3: Action: Name - Task
Action: Sarah - create user stories
Action Item: Mike - update architecturePattern 4: TODO with assignee
TODO: Create user stories (Sarah)
TODO: Update docs - MikePattern 5: Bullet with name
- Sarah: create user stories
- Mike - update architecture#### Extraction Logic
For each action item, extract:
#### Example Parsing
Input:
# Product Planning - Dec 3
Action Items:
- @Sarah to create user stories for chat feature
- Mike will update the architecture doc
- Lisa: review and approve design mockupsParsed:
1. Assignee: Sarah
Task: Create user stories for chat feature
Context: Product Planning meeting - Dec 3
2. Assignee: Mike
Task: Update the architecture doc
Context: Product Planning meeting - Dec 3
3. Assignee: Lisa
Task: Review and approve design mockups
Context: Product Planning meeting - Dec 3Before looking up users or creating tasks, identify the Jira project.
Ask: "Which Jira project should I create these tasks in? (e.g., PROJ, PRODUCT, ENG)"
#### If User is Unsure
Call getVisibleJiraProjects to show options:
getVisibleJiraProjects(
cloudId="...",
action="create"
)Present: "I found these projects you can create tasks in: PROJ (Project Alpha), PRODUCT (Product Team), ENG (Engineering)"
For each assignee name, find their Jira account ID.
#### Lookup Process
lookupJiraAccountId(
cloudId="...",
searchString="[assignee name]"
)The search string can be:
#### Handle Results
Scenario A: Exact Match (1 result)
✅ Found: Sarah Johnson ([email protected])
→ Use accountId from resultScenario B: No Match (0 results)
⚠️ Couldn't find user "Sarah" in Jira.
Options:
1. Create task unassigned (assign manually later)
2. Skip this task
3. Try different name format (e.g., "Sarah Johnson")
Which would you prefer?Scenario C: Multiple Matches (2+ results)
⚠️ Found multiple users named "Sarah":
1. Sarah Johnson ([email protected])
2. Sarah Smith ([email protected])
Which user should be assigned the task "Create user stories"?#### Best Practices
CRITICAL: Always show the parsed action items to the user BEFORE creating any tasks.
#### Presentation Format
I found [N] action items from the meeting notes. Should I create these Jira tasks in [PROJECT]?
1. [TASK] [Task description]
Assigned to: [Name] ([email if found])
Context: [Meeting title/date]
2. [TASK] [Task description]
Assigned to: [Name] ([email if found])
Context: [Meeting title/date]
[...continue for all tasks...]
Would you like me to:
1. Create all tasks
2. Skip some tasks (which ones?)
3. Modify any descriptions or assignees#### Wait for Confirmation
Do NOT create tasks until user confirms. Options:
Once confirmed, create each Jira task.
#### Determine Issue Type
Before creating tasks, check what issue types are available in the project:
getJiraProjectIssueTypesMetadata(
cloudId="...",
projectIdOrKey="PROJ"
)Choose the appropriate issue type:
#### For Each Action Item
createJiraIssue(
cloudId="...",
projectKey="PROJ",
issueTypeName="[Task or available type]",
summary="[Task description]",
description="[Full description with context]",
assignee_account_id="[looked up account ID]"
)#### Task Summary Format
Use action verbs and be specific:
#### Task Description Format
**Action Item from Meeting Notes**
**Task:** [Original action item text]
**Context:**
[Meeting title/date]
[Relevant discussion points or decisions]
**Source:** [Link to Confluence meeting notes if available]
**Original Note:**
> [Exact quote from meeting notes]Example:
**Action Item from Meeting Notes**
**Task:** Create user stories for chat feature
**Context:**
Product Planning Meeting - December 3, 2025
Discussed Q1 roadmap priorities and new feature requirements
**Source:** https://yoursite.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TEAM/pages/12345
**Original Note:**
> @Sarah to create user stories for chat featureAfter all tasks are created, present a comprehensive summary.
Format:
✅ Created [N] tasks in [PROJECT]:
1. [PROJ-123] - [Task summary]
Assigned to: [Name]
https://yoursite.atlassian.net/browse/PROJ-123
2. [PROJ-124] - [Task summary]
Assigned to: [Name]
https://yoursite.atlassian.net/browse/PROJ-124
[...continue for all created tasks...]
**Source:** [Link to meeting notes]
**Next Steps:**
- Review tasks in Jira for accuracy
- Add any additional details or attachments
- Adjust priorities if needed
- Link related tickets if applicable@john to update documentation
@sarah will create the report
@mike should review PR #123Parsed:
John to update documentation
Sarah will create the report
Mike should review PR #123
Lisa needs to test the featureParsed:
Action: John - update documentation
Action Item: Sarah - create the report
AI: Mike - review PR #123Parsed:
TODO: Update documentation (John)
TODO: Create report - Sarah
[ ] Mike: review PR #123Parsed:
- John: update documentation
- Sarah - create the report
* Mike will review PR #123Parsed:
If no action items with assignees are detected:
I analyzed the meeting notes but couldn't find any action items with clear assignees.
Action items typically follow patterns like:
- @Name to do X
- Name will do X
- Action: Name - do X
- TODO: X (Name)
Options:
1. I can search for TODO items without assignees
2. You can point out specific action items to create
3. I can create tasks for bullet points you specify
What would you like to do?If some action items have assignees and some don't:
I found [N] action items:
- [X] with clear assignees
- [Y] without assignees
Should I:
1. Create all [N] tasks ([X] assigned, [Y] unassigned)
2. Only create the [X] tasks with assignees
3. Ask you to assign the [Y] unassigned tasks
Which option would you prefer?If the same person is mentioned different ways:
Notes mention: @sarah, Sarah, Sarah J.
These likely refer to the same person. I'll look up "Sarah" once and use
that account ID for all three mentions. Is that correct?If the same task appears multiple times:
I found what appears to be the same action item twice:
1. "@Sarah to create user stories" (line 15)
2. "Action: Sarah - create user stories" (line 42)
Should I:
1. Create one task (combine duplicates)
2. Create two separate tasks
3. Skip the duplicate
What would you prefer?If action item text is very long (>200 characters):
The task "[long text...]" is quite detailed.
Should I:
1. Use first sentence as summary, rest in description
2. Use full text as summary
3. Let you edit it to be more concise
Which would you prefer?✅ Use consistent @mention format in notes ✅ Include full names when possible ✅ Be specific in action item descriptions ✅ Add context (why/what/when) ✅ Review parsed tasks before confirming
❌ Mix multiple tasks for one person in one bullet ❌ Use ambiguous names (just "John" if you have 5 Johns) ❌ Skip action verbs (unclear what to do) ❌ Forget to specify project
# Meeting Title - Date
Attendees: [Names]
## Decisions
[What was decided]
## Action Items
- @FullName to [specific task with context]
- @AnotherPerson will [specific task with context]
- etc.This skill is for converting meeting action items to Jira tasks only.
Don't use for: ❌ Summarizing meetings (no task creation) ❌ Finding meeting notes (use search skill) ❌ Creating calendar events ❌ Sending meeting notes via email ❌ General note-taking
Use only when: Meeting notes exist and action items need to become Jira tasks.
Input:
Team Sync - Dec 3, 2025
Action Items:
- @Sarah to create user stories for chat feature
- @Mike will update the architecture doc
- @Lisa should review design mockupsProcess:
Output:
✅ Created 3 tasks in PROJ:
1. PROJ-100 - Create user stories for chat feature
Assigned to: Sarah Johnson
2. PROJ-101 - Update the architecture doc
Assigned to: Mike Chen
3. PROJ-102 - Review design mockups
Assigned to: Lisa ParkInput:
Product Review Meeting
Discussed new features and priorities.
Follow-ups:
- Sarah will draft the PRD
- Mike: implement API changes
- TODO: Review security audit (Lisa)
- Update stakeholders on timelineProcess:
Input:
Sprint Planning
Action Items:
- @John to update tests
- @Sarah to refactor codeProcess:
Primary tool: getConfluencePage (if URL) or use pasted text Account lookup: lookupJiraAccountId(searchString) Task creation: createJiraIssue with assignee_account_id
Action patterns to look for:
@Name to/will/should XName to/will/should XAction: Name - XTODO: X (Name)Name: XAlways:
Remember:
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.