deep-code-quality-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited deep-code-quality-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Extremely strict maintainability review. Be ambitious about structure — search for "code judo" moves that make the implementation dramatically simpler.
security-review)ck_finding rule code_quality.file_size (severity high).code_quality.spaghetti_condition.code_quality.unnecessary_abstraction.code_quality.type_boundary.code_quality.wrong_layer.code_quality.orchestration.Additional rules: code_quality.missing_abstraction, code_quality.magic_handling, code_quality.duplicate_logic.
ck_git_diff to get changes. Run ck_validate for automated patterns.ck_finding using the rule IDs above.ck_review_submit (review_type: plan). Wait for approval.No approval unless: no structural regression, no missed simplification, no file explosion, no spaghetti growth, no unnecessary abstraction, no layer leak, no missed decomposition.
parallel-review to run both concurrently.ck_finding records with specific rule IDsck_review_submit plan with prioritized findings~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.