ai-seo-optimizer — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited ai-seo-optimizer (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Audits web pages against Google's official AI Optimization Guide (May 2025), myth-busts common GEO/AEO misconceptions, and evaluates cross-platform AI search visibility (Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, ChatGPT Search, Gemini, Copilot).
web_fetch to retrieve the page content. Extract: title, meta description, H1–H3structure, body text, image alt tags, internal/external links, and any schema markup present.
a Bulk Summary table at the end (see Output Format section).
landing page, other). Adjust audit lens accordingly — see references/page-type-guidance.md.
Inform the user the URL couldn't be fetched and ask them to paste the page content directly.
Analyze every page across three pillars. Read references/analysis-framework.md for full criteria and scoring rubrics.
Based directly on Google's official guide (May 2025). Key areas:
Flag if the page shows evidence of practices Google has officially debunked:
Beyond Google — evaluate for:
Score each pillar out of 10. Produce an Overall AI Visibility Score out of 100 (weighted):
| Score | Grade | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 85–100 | A | Well-optimized for AI search |
| 70–84 | B | Solid foundation, minor gaps |
| 55–69 | C | Moderate issues, prioritize fixes |
| 40–54 | D | Significant gaps, needs rework |
| 0–39 | F | Critical failures, major overhaul needed |
## AI Visibility Audit — [Page Title / URL]
**Page Type**: [Detected type]
**Language**: [Detected language]
---
### Overall Score: [X/100] — Grade [A/B/C/D/F]
| Pillar | Score | Grade |
|--------|-------|-------|
| Google AI Optimization Compliance | X/50 | |
| Myth/Anti-Pattern Cleanliness | X/20 | |
| Cross-Platform AI Visibility | X/30 | |
---
### Pillar 1: Google AI Optimization Compliance [X/50]
**✅ What's Working**
- [Specific positive finding with brief explanation]
**❌ Issues Found**
For each issue:
- **Issue**: [Clear description]
- **Why it matters**: [Grounded in Google's guide — cite the specific principle]
- **Fix**: [Specific, actionable recommendation]
---
### Pillar 2: Myth Audit [X/20]
**Anti-patterns detected** (if any):
- **[Anti-pattern name]**: [What was found on the page] → [Why this doesn't work per Google]
**Clean** (if none found): No debunked optimization practices detected.
---
### Pillar 3: Cross-Platform AI Visibility [X/30]
**Google AI Overviews**: [assessment]
**Perplexity**: [assessment]
**ChatGPT Search / Bing**: [assessment]
**Gemini**: [assessment]
**Copilot**: [assessment]
Key gaps for AI citation likelihood:
- [Finding + fix]
---
### Priority Action Plan
**🔴 Critical (Do First)**
1. [Action] — Impact: [which pillar/score]
**🟡 Important (Do Next)**
2. [Action]
**🟢 Nice to Have**
3. [Action]
---
### Rewrite Offer
*If the user hasn't asked for a rewrite yet:*
> Want me to rewrite [specific section — e.g., intro, meta description, H1] to address these issues?
> Just say which section.After individual audits, append:
---
## Bulk Summary
| Page | Type | Score | Grade | Top Priority Issue |
|------|------|-------|-------|--------------------|
| [URL/name] | [type] | [X/100] | [A-F] | [Single most critical fix] |
**Recommended order of fixes across all pages**: [prioritized list]When the user explicitly asks for optimized content (e.g., "rewrite the intro", "give me a better meta description", "rewrite this section"):
Do NOT proactively rewrite content unless asked. Only offer it at the end of the audit.
Read references/page-type-guidance.md for detailed per-type criteria. Summary:
(Product schema), image quality, review signals, Merchant Center alignment
AI contexts. Never recommend "AI-specific" tactics that contradict this.
optimization matters. Check this first.
outweighs any technical AI optimization tactic.
Note what cannot be assessed without additional access (e.g., server-side rendering, actual CWV data).
references/analysis-framework.md — Full scoring rubrics and criteria for all three pillarsreferences/page-type-guidance.md — Per page-type audit lenses and specific checksreferences/myth-registry.md — Complete registry of debunked AEO/GEO practices with Google'sofficial position on each
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.