structured-debate — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited structured-debate (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
这是 ArchSight Cognition 的公共发现入口，用于保留强分歧，而不是过早调和。内部对应 cogd-general、cogd-technology、cogd-life、cogd-work、cogd-governance、cogd-knowledge、cogd-chinese-thought、cogd-tradition-modernity 和 cogd-technology-humanities。
用户讨论长期议题、价值冲突、社会/技术/人生/组织分歧，或明确要求不要急着给单一答案时使用。
默认使用用户的主要语言输出；中文请求使用下面的中文标题，英文请求可自然翻译为英文标题。
核心张力:
主要立场:
最强论据:
共同事实:
争议事实:
价值冲突:
行动分叉:
开放问题:~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.