git-bisect-assistant — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited git-bisect-assistant (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Automates the git bisect process to efficiently identify the first bad commit responsible for a bug or test failure.
Basic usage pattern:
python scripts/git_bisect_runner.py \
--good <known-good-commit> \
--bad <known-bad-commit> \
--test "<test-command>"Example:
python scripts/git_bisect_runner.py \
--good v1.0.0 \
--bad HEAD \
--test "pytest tests/test_feature.py::test_specific_case"git_bisect_runner.py script with appropriate parameters--good: Known good revision (commit hash, tag, or branch name)--test: Shell command to test each commit. Exit code 0 = good, non-zero = bad--bad: Known bad revision (default: HEAD)--repo: Repository path (default: current directory)--retries: Number of test runs per commit for flaky tests (default: 1)--timeout: Test execution timeout in seconds (default: no timeout)For non-deterministic tests, use --retries to run the test multiple times per commit:
python scripts/git_bisect_runner.py \
--good abc123 \
--bad HEAD \
--test "npm test" \
--retries 3The script uses majority voting: if a test passes 2 out of 3 times, the commit is marked as good.
The test command should:
--retries for flaky tests--timeoutExamples:
# Python test
--test "pytest tests/test_auth.py -v"
# Shell script
--test "./scripts/verify_build.sh"
# Compilation check
--test "make && ./bin/app --version"
# Multiple commands
--test "npm install && npm test"The script generates a comprehensive report including:
User: "The integration tests started failing sometime in the last 20 commits"
python scripts/git_bisect_runner.py \
--good HEAD~20 \
--bad HEAD \
--test "pytest tests/integration/"User: "Feature X worked in v2.1.0 but is broken now"
python scripts/git_bisect_runner.py \
--good v2.1.0 \
--bad HEAD \
--test "python -c 'import app; assert app.feature_x() == expected'"User: "A test fails intermittently, need to find when it started"
python scripts/git_bisect_runner.py \
--good main \
--bad feature-branch \
--test "pytest tests/test_flaky.py" \
--retries 5 \
--timeout 30Bisect fails to start: Verify good and bad revisions exist and are valid git references
Test command fails unexpectedly: Test the command manually on a known good/bad commit first
Inconsistent results: Increase --retries or check for environmental factors affecting tests
Timeout too short: Increase --timeout or optimize test command
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.