jiang-lens-distillation — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited jiang-lens-distillation (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Use this as the map for turning processed episodes into the Jiang Lens. It is not a single autonomous job. Agents should normally use the narrower skill that matches the artifact they are producing.
Start from published or processed artifacts:
content/lens/episodes/<source-slug>/read.jsoncontent/lens/evidence/videos/<source-slug>.semantic.jsoncontent/sources/videos/<source-slug>/transcripts/v1/transcript.clean.jsonlcontent/website/src/content/docs/Do not use this for raw Colab work or single-video episode publication. Use colab-video-pipeline and jiang-video-e2e for that path.
jiang-corpus-impact-passjiang-lens-concept-writerlens-point:* anchors: jiang-lens-atlas-maintainerjiang-provenance-linkerjiang-glossary-entry-writerjiang-canon-promotionjiang-lens-judgeWrite for readers, not pipeline operators. Explain the thing itself: what Jiang's world model sees, how the mechanism works, where it appears, why it matters, and how it changes across the corpus.
Do not say "what belongs here" in public pages unless the page is explicitly about method.
Do not promote agent interpretation directly into canon. Draft interpretive work in content/workflow/proposals/, review it, then promote with jiang-canon-promotion when appropriate.
Every new independent published source should run through jiang-corpus-impact-pass. The pass may decide that the source only adds evidence, or it may justify immediate lens links, concept extension, a new lens seed, atlas morphing, or canon-candidate review. Known duplicate reuploads and archive-only raw artifacts do not create new impact obligations.
The corpus should mutate continuously without turning into an append-only pile.
Do not wait for arbitrary batches.
it only when the maintainer names a bounded source or tightly related concept cluster, or when a fresh source cannot be interpreted without that older support. Prefer useful compact accounting over shallow bulk completion.
worker has produced several compact impact intakes in a row, the next lens run should synthesize: deepen a public concept, split/merge an overgrown page, write a concept-scoped proposal, add durable lens points, or explain why the accumulated impacts still do not justify a public mutation.
lexical slug order. Do not let interview-* sources dominate simply because they sort before predictive-history-*; when impact pressure is otherwise comparable, include classroom episodes and interviews in the same concept cluster.
to function as a lens. Around 6,000 words or 20 distinct sources, consider a split. Around 8,000 words or 25 sources, do not keep appending without an explicit reason.
enough cross-source weight. Fewer than 4 distinct Jiang sources is normally a seed, relation, or parent-section unless the mechanism is foundational.
become fake concepts.
The processed corpus is now an active verifier, not only an output. Before creating or reshaping public lens pages, compare candidate ideas against:
Cheap comparison passes may flag duplicates, missing aliases, weak provenance, or possible related pages. Strong-model judgment is required for public concept creation, concept merging, chronology revision, contradiction handling, canon promotion, or atlas mutation.
Dates are part of meaning. Older and newer positions should remain visible instead of being flattened. When Jiang changes, intensifies, contradicts, or tests a position, preserve:
Use jiang-provenance-linker for exact syntax, but the rule is simple: public lens prose may synthesize, yet important mechanisms, vivid formulations, chronology claims, and bridges need local dated source support.
Great Books lectures can supply deep primitives for the lens, but bridge them into politics, media, education, state mythology, or geopolitics only when exact source refs support both sides.
For lens-visible changes:
node ops/scripts/compile-content.mjs
node ops/scripts/validate-content.mjs
cd website && npm run build~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.