issue-driven-workflow — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited issue-driven-workflow (Agent Skill) and scored it 96/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 1 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 1 flagged
A bulleted imperative like {match} tells the agent to never reveal, disclose, or mention something to the user. Used adversarially it can instruct the agent to hide its tool calls or lie about what it did — stripping the transparency a user relies on to trust the agent.
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The plan and Issue CSV are a work amplifier. Front-load the thinking so the agent has a full plate of actionable work to execute autonomously — more rows means more useful work per run.
The quality bar: every CSV row should be completable, testable, and markable DONE without further clarification.
plan → issues → implement → test → review
assets/_template.md. Choose complexity (simple|medium|complex). python3 .codex/skills/issue-driven-workflow/scripts/create_plan.py \
--task "<title>" --complexity <simple|medium|complex>references/issue-csv-spec.md.Dependencies so execution order is unambiguous. python3 .codex/skills/issue-driven-workflow/scripts/validate_issues_csv.py <issues.csv>The CSV is your execution state. Read it to know where you are, update it as you work, keep driving forward.
TODO row in dependency order.Dev_Status = DOING. Start working.Acceptance is met and Test_Method passes, set Dev_Status = DONE.Review1_Status = DONE.TODO, keep going.DONE, regression check. Mark Regression_Status = DONE per row.If a row is too large, split it. If a row fails, fix it or flag it. If in a git repo, commit at natural boundaries. Edit the CSV directly — re-validate after edits.
| Script | Purpose |
|---|---|
create_plan.py | Create a plan file with YAML frontmatter under plan/ |
list_plans.py | List existing plans (supports --query, --json) |
validate_issues_csv.py | Validate Issue CSV schema and status values |
Run with --help first. Scripts live in scripts/ relative to this skill.
Plans: plan/YYYY-MM-DD_HH-mm-ss-<slug>.md — Issue CSVs: issues/YYYY-MM-DD_HH-mm-ss-<slug>.csv — same timestamp/slug.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.