Web Performance — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited Web Performance (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Pages get optimized for the developer's laptop and fail for the median user on a mid-tier phone over 4G - that is the costly mistake this skill prevents. The outcome is passing Core Web Vitals at the 75th percentile of real users: LCP under 2.5s, INP under 200ms, CLS under 0.1. Everything below is ordered so measurement decides where effort goes, because intuition about performance is wrong more often than it is right.
Run the audit in this order. Fixing before measuring wastes effort on metrics that already pass; measuring in the lab before checking field data optimizes for a synthetic user who does not exist.
Use field data (CrUX, RUM) for what users actually experience; lab data (Lighthouse, WebPageTest) only to debug. Read LCP, INP, and CLS at the 75th percentile. Passing bands: LCP under 2.5s, INP under 200ms, CLS under 0.1. Needs-improvement bands: LCP 2.5-4s, INP 200-500ms, CLS 0.1-0.25; anything beyond those is failing. The failing metric - not the loudest complaint - selects which playbook below to run.
Profile on a throttled mid-tier phone profile and 4G - not the development laptop. Identify the LCP element, the longest main-thread tasks, and the layout-shift sources before changing anything.
Fix the worst-failing metric first, one change at a time.
LCP (target under 2.5s):
CLS (target under 0.1):
INP (target under 200ms):
Lab confirmation is necessary but not sufficient. Confirm the p75 field metric moved over a full collection window before declaring the fix done.
Bad - invisible to the preload scanner, unsized, blocking script:
<div class="hero" style="background-image:url(hero.jpg)"></div>
<script src="analytics.js"></script>Good - discoverable, prioritized, sized, deferred:
<link rel="preload" as="image" href="hero.webp" fetchpriority="high">
<img src="hero.webp" width="1200" height="630" fetchpriority="high" alt="Product dashboard">
<script src="analytics.js" defer></script>The bad version hides the LCP image from the browser's preload scanner (background-image is only discovered after CSS parses), gives the layout engine no dimensions (CLS), and blocks parsing on analytics. The good version typically moves LCP by hundreds of milliseconds on 4G from the preload and priority hints alone.
Produce a performance audit containing: current p75 field values for LCP, INP, and CLS against the 2.5s/200ms/0.1 budgets; the identified LCP element and top main-thread offenders; a ranked fix list where each item names the metric it moves, the specific code change, and the expected direction of impact; and a re-measurement plan (lab check per change, field confirmation at p75 over a full window).
If the bottleneck is server capacity under concurrency rather than client rendering, route to load-testing. Backend query time dominating TTFB belongs with sql-query-optimizer or caching-strategy. Native app jank belongs with mobile-perf-profiler.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.