Stakeholder Update — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited Stakeholder Update (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Stakeholders are busy and skim. A good update answers their questions before they ask them, in under 60 seconds of reading.
Every update has exactly these, in this order:
Subject: [Project] Update — <date> — <Status emoji/word>
Status: 🟢 On track | 🟡 At risk | 🔴 Off track
<One sentence of context.>
Decisions made:
- <decision> — <owner> — <date>
Help needed:
- <specific ask> — owner: <who> — needed by: <date>
Next milestones:
- <milestone> — <target date>
Details (optional, for those who want them):
<links, metrics, deeper context>Use Red/Amber/Green honestly:
Sandbagging (saying green when it's amber) destroys trust the moment reality hits. Flagging amber early is a sign of a strong owner, not a weak one.
Each ask names a person and a date.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.