Cold Email Craft — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited Cold Email Craft (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
A cold email earns a reply by respecting the reader's time and making the next step trivial. The costly mistake this skill prevents is the 200-word "quick question" pitch that reads as mail-merge, burns the prospect, and teaches the founder that outbound doesn't work. Short beats clever; this skill owns the words. If the words are good but nothing lands in the inbox, the problem is infrastructure - route to cold-email-deliverability.
The first line is about them, specific and true: a launch, a hire, a post, a talk. Never "I hope this finds you well," and never open with the sender's name or company. Test: could this line be pasted into an email to anyone else? If yes, it is not personalization. A merge tag that says {{first_name}} only is not personalization either. This line is 80% of the reply-rate difference; spend the research minutes here.
Hard limits: under 90 words, 1-3 sentences per move, one idea, one ask - no menus of options. Mobile-first: it must read in one thumb-scroll.
3-5 words, specific, lowercase is fine, no clickbait, no brackets-gimmicks. It should read like an internal colleague's subject: "flaky tests at acme", "your q3 reporting post". If the subject over-promises what the body delivers, the reply never comes even when the open does.
3-4 follow-ups, spaced 3-5 days apart, each adding a new angle or proof point - never "just bumping this to the top of your inbox."
Bad (114 words, no personalization, three asks):
Subject: Revolutionize Your Data Infrastructure!
Hi {{first_name}},
I hope this email finds you well! My name is Jordan and I'm the founder of
DataFlowPro, a cutting-edge platform that leverages AI to streamline data
pipelines for modern enterprises. We've built a revolutionary solution that
helps companies like yours unlock synergies across their data stack.
I'd love to schedule a 30-minute demo, or I can send over our whitepaper,
or feel free to check out our website. We also offer a free consultation!
Looking forward to hearing from you soon.Good (61 words, personalized, one ask):
Subject: your pipeline post
Hi Maya - your post on the 3am pipeline pages at Northbeam hit home.
We built Dataflow after living the same on-call rotation. Loop, a team
about your size, cut pipeline incidents 70% in their first month.
Worth a 15-min call next week to see if it maps to your setup? Happy
to send a 2-min Loom instead.The difference to copy: the first line proves a human did research, the proof has a number and a comparable company, and there is exactly one primary ask with a lower-friction fallback.
Produce the first-touch email (subject + body, under 90 words, word count shown) plus a 3-4 step follow-up sequence with day spacing and the new angle of each step labeled - ready to paste into the sending tool.
Route domain setup, warmup, volume caps, and spam diagnosis to cold-email-deliverability; multi-channel cadence design to outreach-sequence-designer; list building and verification to prospect-list-builder; and post-reply sales conversation prep to discovery-call-prep.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.