Employment Contract Review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited Employment Contract Review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
An employment contract is where a lot of risk hides in standard-looking boilerplate. This skill walks the key clauses, flags what deviates from market norms, and frames the negotiation. It is not legal advice — material concerns go to a qualified employment lawyer.
Read it as the party with less power. Every clause that is vague, broad, or one-sided favors the drafter (usually the employer). Your job is to surface those and ask whether they are standard or aggressive.
discretionary, and the conditions to earn it.
standard), strike price, and what happens on termination or acquisition.
(acquisition + termination). Double-trigger is market-standard.
90-day default can be punishing; extended windows are increasingly common.
non-competes are red flags and unenforceable in some jurisdictions — flag for legal review.
prior inventions or unrelated personal projects. Look for a carve-out and a prior-inventions schedule.
ordinary information are overbroad.
employer fire without severance; push for a tight, objective definition.
right to sue; flag it.
non-compete scope usually matter most.
outcomes"), not adversarially.
unenforceable.
vague "cause"; discretionary bonus with no definition; 90-day exercise with no flexibility.
Produce a clause-by-clause review table: clause, what it says, market-standard position, deviation flagged (yes/no), and a recommended ask — with a clear note that material legal concerns require a licensed employment attorney.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.