Dependency Risk Audit — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited Dependency Risk Audit (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Third-party packages are the most common source of supply-chain compromise and known-vulnerability exploitation. Treat dependency selection as a security decision, not just a convenience one.
Run the ecosystem's native audit tool first (npm audit, pip-audit, bundle audit, govulncheck). For each finding:
Do not dismiss findings without a written reason.
A dependency with no CVEs today can become a liability tomorrow. For any new or high-traffic dependency check:
Install-time attacks abuse package publication pipelines. Apply these checks:
Licenses create legal exposure, not just engineering risk. Flag any dependency with a copyleft license (GPL, AGPL, EUPL) in a proprietary codebase — these require legal review before shipping. Acceptable defaults for most commercial projects: MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD-2, BSD-3, ISC.
Rank findings: (1) exploitable CVE with available fix, (2) exploitable CVE no fix — needs replacement, (3) abandoned package on a critical path, (4) license conflict, (5) maintenance concern only. Address (1) and (2) before any release. Defer (5) to a scheduled dependency hygiene sprint.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.