SaaS Pricing Model — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited SaaS Pricing Model (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Pricing is the highest-leverage growth lever and the least-tested. A 1% price improvement often beats a 1% gain in acquisition or retention. This skill designs pricing that aligns what you charge with the value you create.
The value metric is the unit you charge by — seats, events, GB, transactions. A good value metric:
Per-seat is simple but caps with headcount. Usage-based aligns with value but hurts predictability. Hybrid (platform fee + usage) is increasingly standard.
Use three tiers as the default. The middle tier should be the one you want most customers to choose — anchor it with a deliberately under-featured low tier and a premium high tier.
signal you are ready to pay.
"contact us."
Gate features by buyer sophistication and willingness to pay, not by cost to build. SSO and audit logs belong in the top tier because they signal budget.
Net revenue retention above 100% is the engine of SaaS compounding. Build expansion in from the start:
customer captures and price at 10-25% of it.
retention.
nobody balks, you are underpriced.
they want fewer calls).
Produce a pricing page spec: the value metric and its rationale, three tiers with feature gates, list prices, annual discount, and the expansion path with target net revenue retention.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.