safe-vs-priced-round — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited safe-vs-priced-round (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The instrument you raise on decides how much you dilute, when, and how much control you trade - often more than the headline valuation does. Founders who treat the SAFE as "free money now" get a nasty surprise at the priced round. This skill makes the choice deliberate.
Use it during [[fundraising-stage-selector]] when sizing the round and before signing anything. Model every choice through [[cap-table-manager]] so the dilution is real, not abstract.
standard (Y Combinator post-money SAFE). Dominant at pre-seed and seed.
absorb the dilution of later SAFEs and the new-round pool. This is the common form - know that you dilute around it.
date (commonly 18-24 months). Rare outside specific situations; the maturity date is a real risk if the next round slips.
and full terms (preferences, protective provisions). More legal cost and time - typically several weeks to close and tens of thousands of dollars in combined legal fees, versus days and near-zero for a standard SAFE.
= more dilution for you, more upside for the investor. The most negotiated term. Quick check: on a post-money SAFE, amount raised ÷ post-money cap = the percentage you just sold ($500k on a $5M cap is 10%, full stop).
conversion. Model both.
grant. Stacking MFN SAFEs can quietly ratchet up everyone's terms.
demand and want to avoid setting a price too early.
cap table and a real valuation, or stacked SAFEs are getting hard to model.
Watch the stacking trap: several uncapped or high-cap SAFEs feel painless until they all convert at the Series A and reveal you sold more than you thought. Always model the fully-converted table before signing the next one. Practitioner red lines: keep cumulative SAFE dilution before the priced round under roughly 20-25%; if the stack is heading past that, or a single round would sell more than ~25%, it is time to price the round instead of adding another SAFE.
A founder raises three post-money SAFEs over 18 months, each feeling small:
No shares have moved, so the cap table still "looks" clean. But 31.1% of the company is already spoken for. At the Series A the lead takes 20% and requires a 10% option pool - carved out pre-money, so it also comes from the founders. Fully converted, the founders wake up below 45% before the B, having believed they were "only giving up 10% at a time."
The fix, applied in time: after the second SAFE (20% committed), the correct move was to price the third raise. A $1M-plus check with 20% already stacked is exactly the "stacked SAFEs are getting hard to model" trigger above - and a priced round would have set the pool with the investors sharing the dilution conversation openly, instead of it landing silently on the founders.
~20-25% cumulative line.
dilution yet."
the term sheet actually carves it.
better of the two.
instrument.
A recommendation (SAFE / note / priced) with the reasoning for this stage, the specific terms to seek and to resist (cap, discount, MFN), and a fully-converted dilution model for the chosen path. Carry terms into [[term-sheet-negotiation]].
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.