Investor Update Writer — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited Investor Update Writer (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Investor updates compound: a founder who sends an honest, consistent update every month builds the trust that makes the next round, the hard intro, and the bad-news conversation easier. The costly failure this skill prevents is the silent founder - updates that stop when metrics dip, which investors read (correctly) as a distress signal, and updates so padded with hype that the one real ask gets skimmed past.
Write in this order because the TL;DR is a compression of everything else - draft it last even though it appears first.
Collect before drafting. Label estimates as estimates in the update itself.
Report three to five numbers, each as current vs prior with the delta, and keep the same metrics every period so trends stay legible. For a venture-backed startup, the non-negotiable core is:
Changing which metrics are shown between periods is how founders accidentally signal they are hiding something. If a metric must change, say why in the update.
Follow the fixed structure:
Subject: [FILL: Company] - [FILL: Month] update
TL;DR: [FILL: headline metric + delta]. [FILL: one win]. [FILL: one challenge].
METRICS ([FILL: month] vs [FILL: prior month])
ARR: $[FILL] vs $[FILL] ([FILL]%)
Growth (MoM): [FILL]%
Net burn: $[FILL]/mo
Runway: [FILL] months
[FILL: key usage metric]: [FILL] vs [FILL]
HIGHLIGHTS
- [FILL: specific, attributable win with a number or name]
- [FILL]
LOWLIGHTS
- [FILL: the miss]. What we're doing: [FILL: concrete plan].
THE ASK
[FILL: one specific, reply-able request - e.g. "Intros to VP Ops at 50-200
person logistics companies; think Flexport, Stord. Forwardable blurb below."]
LOOKING AHEAD
1. [FILL: priority]
2. [FILL: priority]
Last month we said we'd [FILL: prior priority] - status: [FILL: done / slipped + why].Bad ask: "Let us know if you can help with anything!" - un-actionable, gets zero replies.
Good ask: "We're hiring a founding AE. If you know a top seller with 2+ years selling into finance teams at $10-50k ACV, forward them this JD." - one profile, one action, forwardable.
Produce a send-ready update containing the TL;DR, the locked metric block with deltas, two to three highlights, at least one lowlight with its remediation plan, one specific ask, next-period priorities, and a status line closing the loop on last period's priorities.
Ship only when: the update fits on one screen; every metric shows current vs prior with delta and matches last period's metric set; the lowlights section exists and names a real miss; the ask is singular, specific, and answerable by reply; estimates are labeled; and last period's stated priorities are accounted for.
Financial figures in updates are reporting, not accounting advice - runway and burn definitions for board or audit purposes belong with the company's finance professional. For a raise-in-progress narrative aimed at new investors, route to fundraising-narrative; for board-meeting preparation beyond the update, route to board-management.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.