Formatted Report Writer — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited Formatted Report Writer (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
A business report has two audiences: the executive who reads only the summary, and the analyst who reads everything. The costly failure this skill prevents is the report that serves neither - findings buried in chronology, a summary that teases instead of concludes, and a busy reader who gives up before reaching the recommendation they were supposed to approve.
Answer in one sentence each; if the requester cannot, propose an answer and label it a guess:
If these are unclear, the structure will be unclear - settle them first.
Default structure for a business or consulting report:
Each section opens with a one-sentence statement of what it covers, so fast-navigating readers can skip with confidence.
Draft sections 3-6, then compress. The summary states the situation, the key findings (3-5 max), and the recommendation - no suspense, no "this report will explore."
Three levels maximum, used consistently: H1 for major sections (numbered in formal reports), H2 for subsections, H3 only when a subsection has meaningful internal structure. Never use heading levels for visual emphasis - bold a sentence or use a callout instead.
Default to plain register - clear sentences over impressive vocabulary; a report that requires a second read has failed. Passive voice is a red flag: "Revenue declined 18%" beats "An 18% decline in revenue was observed."
Read only the executive summary, the section-opening sentences, and the bolded findings. If that pass does not convey the situation, the evidence, and the recommendation, restructure before polishing prose.
Bad: "This report examines various aspects of the company's customer retention performance over the review period. A number of trends were identified and are discussed in the sections that follow, along with several considerations for management." Why it fails: no finding, no number, no recommendation; passive and self-referential; the executive learns nothing and must read on - which is exactly what they will not do.
Good: "Customer churn rose from 3.1% to 5.4% monthly over the last two quarters, concentrated in accounts onboarded without a kickoff call - those accounts churn at 2.4x the rate of accounts with one. We recommend making kickoff calls mandatory for all new accounts above the starter tier, which we estimate would retain roughly $840K in annual recurring revenue at a cost of one additional CS hire." Why it works: situation, quantified finding, causal pattern, and a recommendation with cost and payoff - a reader who stops here can still act.
Produce the full report in the seven-part skeleton: title block, standalone 150-250-word executive summary containing the recommendation, background, theme-organized findings, analysis, numbered prioritized recommendations, and appendix - with section-opening topic sentences and all skimmability rules applied.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.