code-intelligence — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited code-intelligence (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Pick the search tool by task, not by habit. Generic and language-agnostic; domain skills extend it with server capability matrices and ecosystem prerequisites - for example the terraform-skill plugin (same marketplace) owns the terraform-ls capability matrix and Terraform setup. It is model-triggered guidance, not enforcement.
| Goal | Use | Tradeoff |
|---|---|---|
| Symbol relationships: definition, references, call sites, rename safety | Language server (LSP) at a position | Needs a running server + indexed workspace |
| Exact text, known name, exhaustive enumeration, config/value files | rg then Read | No semantic scope; matches strings in comments too |
| Conceptual / fuzzy / "where might this live" / cross-repo discovery | A semantic/neural search tool, if the host provides one | Not exact; never use for counts or completeness claims |
Detail: Precedence Table, When LSP Is Wrong.
file:line:character). Anchor the position with atext search for a known occurrence first.
returns empty is a usage defect, not server failure.
symbols, not the lines.
while the server indexes.
rename /prepareRename for renames and call hierarchy for callers - they carry language-specific semantics a manual pass misses.
one, redirect: findReferences (then filter to call sites) instead of call hierarchy; enumerate references then hand-edit instead of a rename provider.
Detail: Position Anchoring, Unsupported Operations.
Two distinct cases:
to start): that IS unavailability. Disclose it on the first line (see below) and use text search. The gate does not apply - there is nothing to gate.
"unavailable" yet. Pass ALL three:
documentSymbol on an in-scope file returns symbols -> server responsive(responsiveness only, NOT proof of complete reference coverage).
Only after the three-part case passes is a disclosed text fallback warranted.
Detail: Degradation Gate.
State any tool substitution OR omission on the FIRST line of the response, not in a later summary (post-hoc accounting is a rule violation):
Intended: <tool>. Actual: <tool>. Reason: <why>. Impact: <completeness/confidence>.
Detail: Disclosure Format.
Before claiming a tool (e.g. rg) is shimmed, aliased, or absent, prove it: type -a <tool>, ls -l the resolved path, <tool> --version shows the expected banner. An unproven "tool is missing" claim followed by a fallback is a verification failure, not a sanctioned substitution.
If genuinely absent or aliased: prefer the LSP for semantic tasks; for exact text use the host-approved text search; git grep / grep only as an explicitly disclosed last resort, never the default substitute.
Detail: Anti-Phantom-Shim Proof.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.