handoff — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited handoff (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Declarative phase skill. Invoked by the prd-taskmaster orchestrator when current_phase is HANDOFF. Never called directly by a user.
The one rule: detect what the user has, recommend ONE mode, give the user a structured choice, dispatch the chosen mode. Mode D executes only on tier=premium; otherwise it is a locked teaser.
mcp__plugin_prd_go__check_gate(phase="HANDOFF", evidence={}) for diagnostics.check_gate is an EXIT gate: it requires user_mode_choice and plan_file_exists — both produced by HANDOFF itself, i.e. evidence to advance, not to enter. On first entry neither exists yet, so a gate_passed: false here is EXPECTED — the state machine's legal transitions already guarantee only legal entry.
against re-running a completed phase or skipping ahead from GENERATE.
.taskmaster/docs/prd.md, .taskmaster/tasks/tasks.json,.taskmaster/reports/task-complexity-report.json. If any are missing, report and stop. The gate should have caught this, but belt-and-braces.
Copy into your response before running the procedure:
HANDOFF CHECKLIST:
- [ ] Capabilities detected (tier + per-capability flags)
- [ ] Recommended mode: ___ (reason: ___)
- [ ] Summary displayed (spec location, task count, capabilities)
- [ ] CLAUDE.md task workflow appended (idempotent)
- [ ] AskUserQuestion mode picker surfaced (or prose fallback if hook-blocked)
- [ ] User choice dispatched (Mode A / B / C, or D when tier=premium)
- [ ] Debrief scaffold emitted (optional, silently tolerated)
- [ ] Handoff completeMCP (preferred): mcp__plugin_prd_go__detect_capabilities()
CLI fallback: python3 script.py detect-capabilities
Returns a tier field ("free" or "premium") plus per-capability flags. Key signals:
| Capability | What It Enables |
|---|---|
| superpowers plugin | Modes A, C (brainstorm, plans, subagents) |
| task-master-ai (CLI or MCP) | Mode B (native auto-execute loop) |
| ralph-loop plugin | Mode C (iterative execution loop) |
| atlas-launcher MCP (licensed) | Mode D — Atlas Fleet (tier=premium) |
| atlas-loop / atlas-cdd skills | legacy Mode-D seeds — superseded by atlas-launcher detection |
| Research model (task-master or MCP) | Deep research per task |
| Playwright MCP | Tier S browser verification |
Mode D (Atlas Fleet) unlocks on `tier: "premium"` only — i.e. a licensed atlas-launcher MCP registration detected by detect_atlas_launcher(). Local atlas-loop/atlas-cdd skills do NOT unlock it. See Step 2 and the Mode D section below.
Decision logic (first match wins):
superpowers + ralph-loop present → Mode C (recommended free)superpowers only → Mode A (plan-only, manual drive)task-master-ai only → Mode B (native auto-execute)External-tool modes (E–J: Cursor, RooCode, Codex, Gemini, CodeRabbit, Aider) are offered as alternatives via the alternative_modes field, not primary recommendations. Mode D is recommended iff `tier == "premium"` AND the task graph parallelizes (>= 2 independent dependency chains — check `fleet-waves` output: any wave with >= 2 chunks). Premium + serial graph: recommend the best free mode and say why ("your tasks form a single dependency chain — Verified Loop is the right tool here"); Fleet stays selectable but not default. Free tier: Mode D is a locked Atlas Pro teaser, never selectable, regardless of which local plugins are installed.
Recommended: Plan Only
superpowers:writing-plans creates your implementation plan
Plan references TaskMaster task IDs from tasks.json
You drive execution manuallyRecommended: TaskMaster Auto-Execute
MCP: mcp__task-master-ai__next_task -> implement -> set_task_status(id, "done") (Mode B — TaskMaster backend only)
CLI: task-master next -> implement -> task-master set-status --id N --status done (Mode B — TaskMaster backend only)
Native TaskMaster execution loop (no external orchestrator required)Recommended: Plan + Ralph Loop
superpowers:writing-plans → implementation plan referencing tasks.json IDs
ralph-loop wraps each task:
next_task → set_task_status("in-progress") → research if <80% confident
→ subagent-driven-development → execution gate (Tier A+ evidence)
→ post-doubt check → log to .claude/verification-log.md
→ set_task_status("done") → TodoWrite → repeat
Completion: doubt agent reviews verification log before promise satisfied.🔒 Atlas Fleet Atlas Pro · $29/mo
Parallel multi-session execution across Claude, Codex, and Gemini:
your task graph split into dependency waves of isolated git worktrees
checker-gated merges into one integration branch, one final PR
durable inbox result collection (verified, not narrated)
CDD evidence card per task; one SHIP_CHECK_OK at the end
Walk away, come back to proof.
Unlock: https://atlas-ai.au/pro (the free modes above stay free forever)When `tier == "premium"` (licensed atlas-launcher detected): Mode D is a real, selectable mode — dispatching it invokes /prd:execute-fleet (the wave orchestrator skill). Show the unlocked card:
▸ Atlas Fleet ★ Pro · license active
<N> waves · est. from your dependency graph · walk-awayWhen `tier == "free"`: Mode D is a locked teaser — not selectable, never executed. If the user selects it while locked, respond with:
"Atlas Fleet is part of Atlas Pro ($29/mo). On this project it would split your tasks into parallel waves across isolated worktrees with checker-gated merges and one final PR. Unlock at https://atlas-ai.au/pro — your spec and tasks are saved. Meanwhile, everything else is free forever: please pick one of the free modes below."
Then re-invoke the mode picker (AskUserQuestion) with Mode D removed from the options.
detect_capabilities returns alternative_modes when these tools are installed. Users can pick any of them instead of Modes A–D. All are tool-agnostic wrappers around the same .taskmaster/tasks/tasks.json.
| Mode | Tool | Invocation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| E | Cursor Composer | cursor --open .taskmaster/tasks/tasks.json, @-ref in Composer | |
| F | RooCode | VS Code command palette → RooCode: Run tasks.json | |
| G | Codex CLI | `python3 script.py next-task \ | codex implement` (free via ChatGPT) |
| H | Gemini CLI | gemini --file .taskmaster/tasks/tasks.json implement next (free via Google) | |
| I | CodeRabbit | Implement via A–H, open PR, CodeRabbit reviews per task. Combines with other modes. | |
| J | Aider | aider --read .taskmaster/tasks/tasks.json — pair-programming style |
Use the deterministic subcommand — do not do raw Read+Edit. This path is idempotent, takes a timestamped backup when modifying an existing file, and uses HTML-comment sentinels so re-runs are no-ops.
## Task Execution Workflow (prd-taskmaster)
When implementing tasks, prefer backend operations:
1. `python3 script.py next-task` — get next ready task
2. `python3 script.py set-status --id <id> --status in-progress` — note hyphen; underscore is rejected
3. Implement the task (follow the plan step linked to this task)
4. `python3 script.py set-status --id <id> --status done` — mark complete
5. Update TodoWrite with progress
6. Repeat from step 1
Valid statuses: `pending`, `in-progress`, `done`, `review`, `blocked`, `deferred`, `cancelled`.
### Progress Tracking
- Update TodoWrite BEFORE and AFTER each task
- Cannot proceed to next task without updating TodoWrite
- TodoWrite = user visibility. TaskMaster = source of truth.idempotent (HTML-comment sentinels gate the write), so the information is surfaced to the user via the Step-4 summary and the AskUserQuestion options (Step 5) before dispatch, not via a plan dialog:
python3 $SKILL_DIR/script.py append-workflow \
--target ./CLAUDE.md \
--content-file /tmp/pdtm-workflow-section.mdThe JSON response reports one of:
action: "created" — no prior CLAUDE.md, fresh file with markersaction: "skipped" (reason: markers_present) — already wired, no-opaction: "appended" — existing CLAUDE.md untouched except for theappended marker block; backup_path points at CLAUDE.md.prd-taskmaster-backup-<ts>
If the user wants a preview before the write, surface the planned content inside the AskUserQuestion options or as an informational paragraph in the Step 4 summary — describe what would be written without invoking any plan-dialog tool.
Render the handoff panel and print it: MCP render_status(phase="HANDOFF") → print rendered; CLI python3 script.py status --phase HANDOFF. (Fallback — emit a compact block before the mode picker so the user has full context:)
Spec Generated: .taskmaster/docs/prd.md
Validation: <GRADE> (<score>/<max>)
Tasks: <count> tasks parsed with dependencies (see .taskmaster/tasks/tasks.json)
Complexity: analyzed via TaskMaster (.taskmaster/reports/task-complexity-report.json)
Research: <expanded|skipped>
Capabilities:
[check] TaskMaster (MCP|CLI)
[check|circle] Playwright (browser verification)
[check|circle] Research provider
[check|circle] Ralph-loop plugin
[check|circle] Atlas Fleet (premium: selectable · free: locked)HANDOFF is the moment of user agency. Prose recommendations are skippable; tool calls are not. You MUST invoke AskUserQuestion in this step. This is hard-enforced — prose-only fallback is a bug, not a shortcut.
AskUserQuestion gives the user an explicit, structured, machine-readable choice. That's the durable handoff record. The user's selection is logged programmatically and downstream steps dispatch on it directly — no parsing natural-language affirmatives, no ambiguity.
another tool…")
B: "run task-master next" with the first ready task ID (Mode B — TaskMaster backend only))
available execution mode. Use the user-facing names (internal IDs in parentheses are for this skill only — never shown to the user):
(recommended when superpowers + a loop runner are present)
Mark the recommended mode as the default (Atlas Fleet may be the default only when tier=premium AND the graph parallelizes). Selecting Atlas Fleet while locked (free tier) returns the upgrade response (see the Mode D block in Step 2) and re-prompts with only the free modes (plus any applicable alternatives).
superpowers:writing-plans with spec path.taskmaster/docs/prd.md
task-master next command + the firstready task ID surfaced from .taskmaster/tasks/tasks.json
.claude/atlas-loop-prompt.md describing thetask-execution contract, then invoke /goal with the condition:
"SHIP_CHECK_OK has been emitted by .atlas-ai/ship-check.py AND all tasks in .taskmaster/tasks/tasks.json show status=done AND /sync has been invoked this session"
The /goal session continues until the Haiku evaluator verifies the condition. Each iteration runs the execute-task 13-step cycle and checks the condition after step 13. /sync MUST be the last action before SHIP_CHECK_OK is emitted (per execute-task Termination). (Migrated from /ralph-loop:ralph-loop 2026-06-04 — Claude Code's built-in /goal evaluator structurally solves the controller-wears- different-hats triple-verify rot caught in the 2026-06-03 audit.)
/prd:execute-fleet — it owns the wave loop, worker dispatch, verification, merges, and SHIP_CHECK_OK termination. (free tier: upgrade response only, re-prompt)If PreToolUse:AskUserQuestion is hook-blocked (automated / orchestrator / fleet session), fall back to a prose option table preserving the same semantics — labels, descriptions, Mode D locked Atlas Pro teaser, recommended mode marked. Surface the hook block as an `[AI]` insight block so the parent orchestrator can detect the fallback:
[AI] Hook blocked AskUserQuestion — a PreToolUse hook disables interactive questions for this session (automated mode). Surfacing the mode picker in prose instead. A parent orchestrator should either lift the hook for skills with requires_user_agency:true or supply the mode selection as part of the spawn directive.The prose fallback MUST NOT invoke any plan-mode dialog. AskUserQuestion is the sole user-agency mechanism in this skill — when it is unavailable, the prose table is the documented fallback.
The skill's deterministic layer exposes python3 script.py handoff-gate --recommended <A|B|C> (when implemented). This emits the full mode option set as structured JSON on stdout, enabling tests and external orchestrators to drive the handoff without the LLM layer. Use this when you need deterministic, LLM-skippable handoff enforcement.
DO NOT say "Ready to proceed with Mode X? (or type 'options')" as your only gate. That is a prose prompt the model can skip or satisfy with a fake affirmative. The v4 dogfood (LEARNING #16 → #20) surfaced this exact pattern as a user-agency hole. AskUserQuestion is the fix.
Every successful HANDOFF calls the deterministic debrief scaffolder as its final act, so the run does not leave only artifacts (PRD, tasks.json, complexity report) with no record of what actually happened:
SLUG="$(basename "$PWD")"
python3 "$SKILL_DIR/script.py" debrief \
--slug "$SLUG" \
--grade "$VALIDATION_GRADE" \
--output-dir docs/v4-release 2>/dev/null || trueEXCELLENT 56/57, etc.)..taskmaster/{tasks/tasks.json, reports/task-complexity-report.json, docs/prd.md}— no path flags needed in the common case.
|| true) — a missing complexity report orgitignored docs/v4-release/ must never block a handoff that otherwise succeeded.
output_path in the JSON response; surface itto the user as "Debrief scaffolded at: <path>. Judgment sections (worked / broke / meta) left as TODO — fill them in before the memory fades."
If docs/v4-release/ doesn't exist in the target project (most projects won't — this is a prd-taskmaster convention), skip the call or let it fail silently. The scaffold is only useful for projects that retain it.
Gate: capabilities detected AND a mode recommended AND CLAUDE.md workflow appended AND AskUserQuestion surfaced (or prose fallback with `[AI]` insight if hook-blocked) AND the user's choice dispatched.
Emit a compact one-block status:
Handoff:
capabilities tier: <free|premium>
recommended mode: <A|B|C>
CLAUDE.md: <created|appended|skipped>
picker: <AskUserQuestion|prose-fallback>
user choice: <A|B|C|D-teased>
dispatched: <skill/command invoked, or "waitlist re-prompt">
debrief: <path or "skipped">After the evidence gate passes:
mcp__plugin_prd_go__advance_phase(expected_current="HANDOFF", target="EXECUTE", evidence={"user_mode_choice": "<A|B|C>", "plan_file_exists": True, "capabilities_tier": "<free|premium>"}).The call atomically transitions pipeline.json from HANDOFF to EXECUTE. The expected_current field is the compare-and-swap guard; evidence is stored under phase_evidence[EXECUTE] for audit.
prd-taskmaster skill). Do NOT invokeEXECUTE directly — the orchestrator re-reads current_phase and routes.
Use AskUserQuestion. A structured choice is the durable record; prose affirmatives are skippable.
Fall back to the prose option table + [AI] insight block. The user still picks; you just surface the choice in a different shape.
so I'll execute it" → NO. Mode D is always a teaser. Detection returns atlas_auto: false until the feature ships.
→ NO. action: "skipped" is the expected idempotent outcome; emit it and proceed. Skipping the call means you don't know the state.
first, always.
scaffolder is silently tolerant (|| true) — a missing docs/v4-release/ is not a handoff failure.
This skill does not use explicit process termination. A hard block reports the reason and returns control to the orchestrator; the orchestrator decides whether to surface to the user.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.