adr — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited adr (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Capture architectural decisions as they happen, so the why lives next to the code instead of in a Slack thread or someone's memory. Produces lightweight ADR documents under docs/adr/.
adr, architecture decision record, decision, rationale, trade-off, alternatives, we decided, why did we choose, design decision, supersede, decision log, nygard
language, pattern, API shape, infra/deploy approach, build vs buy.
For trivial or easily-reversible choices, don't create an ADR — note it inline and move on.
| Request | Output |
|---|---|
/adr new "<title>" | A new docs/adr/NNNN-<slug>.md + an updated index |
/adr list | The decision log (ID, title, status, date) |
/adr supersede <NNNN> | A new ADR marked as superseding an old one; old one flipped to superseded |
Lightweight Nygard ADR, adapted for AI-assisted work:
# ADR-NNNN: <Decision Title>
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Status**: proposed | accepted | deprecated | superseded by ADR-NNNN
**Deciders**: <who was involved>
## Context
What is the issue motivating this decision? The situation, constraints, and forces at
play. 2–5 sentences.
## Decision
What we are doing. 1–3 sentences, stated clearly.
## Alternatives Considered
### <Alternative>
- **Pros**: …
- **Cons**: …
- **Why not**: the specific reason it was rejected.
(Repeat per alternative.)
## Consequences
### Positive
- …
### Negative / trade-offs
- …
### Risks
- <risk and its mitigation>docs/adr/ does not exist, ask the user to confirm beforecreating it. On confirmation, create the directory, a README.md seeded with the index table header (below), and a template.md copy of the format above. Never create files without explicit consent.
docs/adr/NNNN-*.md(start at 0001). Slug = kebab-case of the title.
the alternatives actually weighed, and the consequences. Do not invent alternatives that were never discussed; if context is thin, ask one or two targeted questions.
accepted when the user states a decision; proposed when stillweighing. Date = today.
docs/adr/README.md.docs/adr/README.md:
# Architecture Decision Records
| ID | Title | Status | Date |
|----|-------|--------|------|
| [ADR-0001](0001-use-eks-over-ecs.md) | Use EKS over ECS | accepted | 2026-06-10 |Status to superseded by ADR-MMMM.Never delete or rewrite a past ADR's decision — superseding preserves the history of why it changed, which is the whole point.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.