Pull Request Message

Core Workflow

1. Determine the source material:

• Current local changes.
• A branch compared with a base branch.
• A provided diff, commit list, issue, or existing PR/MR draft.

1. If deriving from a repository, inspect only the smallest useful change set:

• Run git status --short first.
• If using current local changes, inspect git diff --stat, git diff,

git diff --cached --stat, and git diff --cached as needed.

• If using a branch comparison, identify the base branch, then inspect

git diff --stat <base>...HEAD, git diff <base>...HEAD, and git log --oneline <base>..HEAD as needed.

1. Summarize the problem the user encounters that this change addresses before

describing the implementation.

1. Draft the PR/MR message using the standard template unless the repository

provides its own template.

1. Include validation only when it was actually run or explicitly provided. If

no validation information is available, include a placeholder such as Not run (reason not provided).

1. Call out risks, migrations, rollout notes, screenshots, or follow-up work

when they are relevant to reviewing or merging the change.

Standard Template

## Summary

<One or two sentences describing what this change does.>

## Motivation

<Why this change is needed, what problem it solves, or what context led to it.>

## Modifications

- <Concrete implementation change>
- <Concrete implementation change>
- <Concrete implementation change>

## Result

<What is different after this change lands. Describe user-visible, developer-facing, or operational impact.>

## Validation

- <Command, test, manual check, or "Not run" with a short reason>

Optional sections:

## Screenshots

<Before/after images or a note that screenshots are not applicable.>

## Risks and Rollout

- <Compatibility, migration, deployment, or rollback notes>

## Follow-ups

- <Known remaining work that is intentionally out of scope>

Drafting Rules

• Prefer Summary over a one-line placeholder at the top. It gives reviewers

an immediate answer before they read context.

• Use Motivation for the "why", not an implementation recap.
• Use Modifications for reviewable facts from the diff.
• Use Result for behavior, workflow, API, or documentation impact after the

change is merged.

• Use Validation for tests and checks. Do not mix validation into Result.
• Keep bullets specific and parallel. Start each bullet with an active verb

when it reads naturally.

• Do not invent issue IDs, benchmarks, screenshots, tests, approvals, or user

impact.

• If information is missing, write a clear placeholder such as

Not run (reason not provided) rather than pretending the check happened.

• Keep the final message concise enough for reviewers to scan.

Output Guidance

• Provide a complete copy-ready PR/MR description.
• If the user asks for feedback on a template, briefly explain improvements

before giving the revised template.

• If there are multiple reasonable levels of detail, default to the shorter

version and include only review-critical context.

• Mention any assumptions made from the diff or provided context.

Reference

For examples and template variants, read references/template.md only when the task needs additional examples or a different PR/MR style.