Three complementary agent skills for academic research: WRITES papers, FINDS papers on a topic, READS any paper as a visual experience (mind maps, flowcharts, plain-English). Runtime-neutral, works with 50+ agents. Install: npx skills add aniketkrs/research-paper
SaferSkills independently audited research-paper (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
A production-grade agent skill that turns any compatible coding agent (Claude Code, OpenCode, Cursor, Cline, Codex, Aider, Amp, Antigravity, and 50+ others) into a multi-agent research system:
Orchestrator → Researcher → Methodologist → Analyst → Visualizer → Writer → Citation engine → Validator → Reviewer → Publisher.
It produces full, citation-heavy, visually rich, publication-ready outputs in arXiv / IEEE / ACM / Nature / Harvard styles, plus literature reviews, theses, technical whitepapers, survey papers, and policy briefs.
This file is the entry point. It is intentionally compact. Heavier guidance (instructions, workflows, engines, validators, rubrics) lives in the topic folders below and is loaded on demand via Claude Code's filesystem tools (progressive disclosure).
| Command | What it does |
|---|---|
/research <topic> | Full empirical research paper |
/paper <topic> | Same as /research, more permissive |
/literature-review <topic> | Systematic / scoping / narrative literature review |
/whitepaper <topic> | Industry / technical whitepaper |
/thesis <topic> | Thesis / dissertation chapter |
/survey <topic> | State-of-the-art / survey paper |
/policy <topic> | Policy brief or full policy paper |
Common options (any command): --style [harvard|apa|ieee|mla|chicago|nature|arxiv-numeric], --format [arxiv|ieee|acm|nature|harvard|...], --depth [quick|standard|comprehensive], --sources [N], --visualizations [auto|N|none], --audience [academic|technical|executive|general].
<style>."Blog posts, marketing copy, tweets, casual answers, or single-paragraph explanations. Those are handled normally without this skill.
or writing, determine today's actual date — via system clock (date -u +%Y-%m-%d), runtime context, or asking the user. Never default silently to the training-data cutoff. Year ranges (--years last-3) are computed from today, not from the model's training year. Full protocol: instructions/freshness.md.
orchestration/pipeline.md. Never jump into prose.
step. Never preload the whole skill.
dataset, equation, or explicit derivation.
authors, or volumes. Mark gaps with [CITATION NEEDED] or [UNVERIFIED] and surface them in Known gaps.
hyperparameters are documented end-to-end.
summary" for non-specialists (see prompts/simplification-prompts.md).
geography, and processes always get a figure or table (see visualization_engine/decision-engine.md).
(review_pipeline/) and the publication checklist (quality_control/publication-checklist.md) before delivery.
Known gapsblock at the end of the paper.
orchestration/agents.md.
intake → plan → lit-review → methodology → data-analysis →
visualization → drafting → citations → validation → review → shipEach step has a dedicated playbook. Read it, do the step, persist the artifact to disk, move on. Detailed master pipeline: `orchestration/pipeline.md`.
When the user does not specify a format, infer it:
| Signal | Use template |
|---|---|
| ML / NLP / AI / preprint / arxiv-style | templates/arxiv-paper.md |
| Engineering / hardware / signal / IEEE conference | templates/ieee-paper.md |
| HCI / systems / SIGCHI / SIGGRAPH / ACM | templates/acm-paper.md |
| Biology / medicine / Nature / Science / structured | templates/nature-paper.md |
| Social science / business / humanities / Harvard | templates/harvard-paper.md |
| Literature / systematic / scoping / meta review | templates/literature-review.md |
| Thesis chapter / dissertation | templates/thesis-chapter.md |
| Whitepaper / industry / enterprise | templates/whitepaper.md |
| Survey / state-of-the-art | templates/survey-paper.md |
| Policy brief / regulatory | templates/policy-paper.md |
If still ambiguous, ask once, then proceed.
Map domain → default style if not specified:
Style rules: citation_engine/citation-styles.md. Per-style modules: citation_engine/styles/. The deterministic formatter is toolchains/format_bibliography.py.
Full rules: visualization_engine/decision-engine.md and visualization_engine/visualization-guide.md. Rendering happens via toolchains/generate_charts.py; if Python is unavailable, the skill falls back to Markdown tables + Mermaid diagrams — never silently skips a planned figure.
| Communication goal | Recommended figure |
|---|---|
| Compare discrete categories | Bar / horizontal bar / lollipop |
| Show trend over time | Line / multi-line |
| Show distribution | Histogram / violin / box plot |
| Show relationship | Scatter + regression line |
| Show correlation among many vars | Heatmap |
| Show parts of a whole | Stacked bar (preferred over pie) |
| Show flow / transformation | Sankey |
| Show structure / pipeline | Architecture / flowchart |
| Show process / decision | Mermaid flowchart |
| Show geography | Choropleth / point map |
| Show timeline of events | Timeline / Gantt |
| Show conceptual hierarchy | Mind map / tree |
| Side-by-side metrics | Comparative table |
This skill works in three tiers, gracefully degrading:
| Tier | Capabilities |
|---|---|
| 0. Pure prose (no tools) | Outline + draft + Markdown tables + Mermaid diagrams |
| 1. + Filesystem read/write | Persist sections, bibliography, validation reports |
| 2. + Python (pandas/matplotlib) | Real charts (PNG + SVG), statistical validation, data analysis |
| 2+. + Web search / fetch | DOI verification, source retrieval, retraction checks |
| 2+. + Pandoc (optional) | Output to PDF / DOCX / HTML / LaTeX / RTF / EPUB / ODT / PPTX |
If a tier is missing, the skill detects it and adapts — no silent failures. See `toolchains/README.md` for setup.
The skill produces Markdown by default. For other formats, run the output converter:
python toolchains/convert_output.py --input paper-final.md --to pdf --out paper.pdf
python toolchains/convert_output.py --input paper-final.md --to docx
python toolchains/convert_output.py --input paper-final.md --to html
python toolchains/convert_output.py --input paper-final.md --to tex
python toolchains/convert_output.py --input paper-final.md --to epubSupported targets (via Pandoc): md (always), html, docx, pdf (needs LaTeX), tex, rtf, epub, odt, pptx.
Self-test:
python toolchains/convert_output.py --self-testThe user can also request a non-Markdown output directly:
/research "topic" --output paper.pdf
/research "topic" --output paper.docxEvery artifact this skill produces includes, at minimum:
(unless purely theoretical and explicitly opted out).
Anything missing is surfaced in a final `Known gaps` block — never silently swallowed.
For papers > ~10,000 words:
(paper-spec.md → outline.md → bibliography.yaml → methodology.md → analysis/findings.md → figures-plan.md → sections/<NN>-<name>.md → paper-draft.md → paper-cited.md → paper-final.md).
cover-to-cover read pass.
Full strategy: `long_context/strategy.md`.
For deep / parallel runs, dispatch sub-agents:
| Agent | Reads | Writes |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | prompts/literature-search.md | bibliography.yaml, lit-themes.md |
| Methodologist | prompts/methodology-design.md | methodology.md |
| Analyst | prompts/data-analysis.md | analysis/findings.md |
| Visualizer | prompts/visualization-planning.md | figures-plan.md, figures/ |
| Writer (×N) | prompts/writing-prompts.md | sections/<NN>-<name>.md |
| Citator | prompts/citation-prompts.md | paper-cited.md |
| Validator | validators/ | validation/ |
| Reviewer (×3) | prompts/review-prompts.md | review/ |
Topology: `orchestration/agents.md`.
[UNVERIFIED], listed in Known gaps.subsection.
Future work.
Full failure-handling matrix: `orchestration/failure-handling.md`.
orchestration/pipeline.mdtemplates/prompts/writing-prompts.mdcitation_engine/, workflows/citation-pipeline.mdvisualization_engine/, workflows/visual-generation-pipeline.mdmethodology_engine/statistical-methods.md,toolchains/statistical_validation.py
review_pipeline/, rubrics/academic-quality.mdquality_control/publication-checklist.mdAlways prefer reading the specific file you need over re-reading this one.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.