06-design-plan — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited 06-design-plan (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Create the Figma construction plan that the figma-designer agent will execute.
Parse $ARGUMENTS:
Hard dependencies:
docs/workflow-status.md — verify step 05 (Design Doc) status == completeddocs/workflow-status.md — verify step 03 (PRD) status == completeddocs/Design/{{PROJECT_NAME}}-design-document.md exists with color + typography sectionsdocs/prds/*.md exists with user storiesIf prerequisites fail:
/05-design-doc first."/03-prd first."Soft dependencies:
.claude/knowledge/figma-mcp-reference.md (MCP API patterns for call budgeting)CLAUDE.md — project context.impeccable.md — brand personality, design principlesdocs/Design/{{PROJECT_NAME}}-design-document.md — all tokens, component specsdocs/prds/ — extract user stories for screen mapping.claude/knowledge/figma-mcp-reference.md — API patterns, call budgettemplates/design-plan-template.md — output structureSpawn the design-planner agent:
Create the Figma construction plan for {{PROJECT_NAME}}.
>
Design document: [content — tokens, components, principles] PRD user stories: [list with story IDs] MCP reference: [call budget, API patterns] Template: [content of templates/design-plan-template.md] Focus: [from $ARGUMENTS if specific batch/screen]>
Requirements: - Map every PRD user story to at least one screen - Organize screens into batches by user flow (4-7 per batch) - Write consistency rules referencing design doc token names - Write inline frame tree specs for at least batch 1 - Include token sync log structure - Include component instance reference table (empty, populated during construction) - Include execution checklists per batch - Save to docs/Design/figma-design-plan.mdBefore delegating, read and summarize prior step outputs:
The design plan agent reads the full design document (potentially 50KB+). To prevent context rot:
docs/Design/figma-design-plan.md existsIf validation fails:
"The design plan did not meet requirements: [specific failure]. Current output: [screen count, batch count, missing mappings]. Please fix: [specific instruction]."
blocked (reason) in docs/workflow-status.mddocs/workflow-status.md step 06 status to needs-review/06-design-plan [continue] to approve, or provide feedback."[continue] after needs-review transitions to completedStep 06 — Design Plan: [status]
Output: docs/Design/figma-design-plan.md
Total screens: [count] across [batch count] batches
Batch 1: [screen count] screens ([flow name]) — specs: [written/pending]
Batch 2: [screen count] screens ([flow name]) — specs: pending
...
Components referenced: [count]
Consistency rules: [count]
Next step: /07-figmadocs/workflow-status.md — extract step 06 sectiondocs/Design/figma-design-plan.mddocs/workflow-status.md step 06~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.