03-prd — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited 03-prd (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Create Product Requirements Documents from the prioritized backlog.
Parse $ARGUMENTS:
Hard dependencies:
docs/workflow-status.md — verify step 02 status == completeddocs/backlog/{{PROJECT_NAME}}-backlog.md has MVP scope locked (P0-P3 assigned)If prerequisites fail:
/02-prioritize first."Soft dependencies:
.impeccable.md brand direction (improves story quality but not blocking)$ARGUMENTS names a specific feature/epic, scope to thatdocs/prds/ to determine what's already writtenFor each feature/epic needing a PRD, spawn the product-manager agent:
Write a PRD for [feature name] in {{PROJECT_NAME}}.
>
Backlog entry: [relevant section from backlog] Template: [content oftemplates/prd-template.md] User story template: [content oftemplates/user-story-template.md] Brand context: [from.impeccable.mdif available]
>
Output requirements: - Problem statement with user pain points - ≥5 user stories in Given/When/Then format - Acceptance criteria for each story - Success metrics (adoption, engagement, retention, quality) - Scope boundaries ("what we're NOT building") - Dependencies and risks - Save to docs/prds/[feature-slug].mdBefore delegating, read and summarize prior step outputs:
docs/prds/If validation fails:
"The PRD did not meet requirements: [specific failure]. Current output: [summary]. Please fix: [specific instruction]."
blocked (reason) in docs/workflow-status.md<!-- CUSTOMIZE: Define domain-specific quality checks for PRD output -->
After structural validation, optionally assess quality:
docs/workflow-status.md step 03 status to needs-review/03-prd [continue] to approve, or provide feedback."[continue] after needs-review transitions to completedStep 03 — PRD Creation: [status]
PRDs written: [count]
- [feature-name]: [story count] user stories
- [feature-name]: [story count] user stories
Total user stories: [count]
Next steps:
/04-inspiration — UI inspiration research (can run in parallel)
/05-design-doc — after inspiration research completesdocs/workflow-status.md — extract step 03 sectiondocs/prds/ with story countsdocs/prds/*.md — count PRDsdocs/workflow-status.md step 03~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.