load-balancing-patterns — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited load-balancing-patterns (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Distribute traffic across infrastructure using the appropriate load balancing approach, from simple round-robin to global multi-region failover.
Use load-balancing-patterns when:
Layer 4 (L4) - Transport Layer:
Layer 7 (L7) - Application Layer:
For detailed comparison including performance benchmarks and hybrid approaches, see references/l4-vs-l7-comparison.md.
| Algorithm | Distribution Method | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Round Robin | Sequential | Stateless, similar servers |
| Weighted Round Robin | Capacity-based | Different server specs |
| Least Connections | Fewest active connections | Long-lived connections |
| Least Response Time | Fastest server | Performance-sensitive |
| IP Hash | Client IP-based | Session persistence |
| Resource-Based | CPU/memory metrics | Varying workloads |
Shallow (Liveness): Is the process alive?
/health/live or /liveDeep (Readiness): Can the service handle requests?
/health/ready or /readyHealth Check Hysteresis: Different thresholds for marking up vs down to prevent flapping
For complete health check implementation patterns, see references/health-check-strategies.md.
Application Load Balancer (ALB) - Layer 7:
Network Load Balancer (NLB) - Layer 4:
Global Accelerator - Layer 4 Global:
Application LB (L7): Global HTTPS LB, Cloud CDN integration, Cloud Armor (WAF/DDoS) Network LB (L4): Regional TCP/UDP, pass-through balancing, session affinity Cloud Load Balancing: Single anycast IP, global distribution, backend buckets
Application Gateway (L7): WAF integration, URL-based routing, SSL termination, autoscaling Load Balancer (L4): Basic and Standard SKUs, health probes, HA ports Traffic Manager (Global): DNS-based routing (priority, weighted, performance, geographic)
For complete cloud provider configurations and Terraform examples, see references/cloud-load-balancers.md.
Best for: General-purpose HTTP/HTTPS load balancing, web application stacks
Capabilities:
Basic configuration:
upstream backend {
least_conn;
server backend1.example.com:8080 weight=3;
server backend2.example.com:8080 weight=2;
keepalive 32;
}
server {
listen 80;
location / {
proxy_pass http://backend;
proxy_set_header Host $host;
proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
}
}For complete NGINX patterns and advanced configurations, see references/nginx-patterns.md.
Best for: Maximum performance, database load balancing, resource efficiency
Capabilities:
Basic configuration:
frontend http_front
bind *:80
default_backend web_servers
backend web_servers
balance roundrobin
option httpchk GET /health
server web1 192.168.1.101:8080 check
server web2 192.168.1.102:8080 checkFor complete HAProxy patterns, see references/haproxy-patterns.md.
Best for: Microservices, Kubernetes, service mesh integration
Capabilities:
For complete Envoy patterns, see references/envoy-patterns.md.
Best for: Docker/Kubernetes environments, dynamic configuration, ease of use
Capabilities:
For complete Traefik patterns, see references/traefik-patterns.md.
| Controller | Best For | Strengths |
|---|---|---|
| NGINX Ingress (F5) | General purpose | Stability, wide adoption, mature features |
| Traefik | Dynamic environments | Easy configuration, service discovery |
| HAProxy Ingress | High performance | Advanced L7 routing, reliability |
| Envoy (Contour/Gateway) | Service mesh | Rich L7 features, extensibility |
| Kong | API-heavy apps | JWT auth, rate limiting, plugins |
| Cloud Provider | Single-cloud | Native cloud integration |
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: app-ingress
annotations:
nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/ssl-redirect: "true"
nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/affinity: "cookie"
spec:
ingressClassName: nginx
tls:
- hosts:
- app.example.com
secretName: app-tls
rules:
- host: app.example.com
http:
paths:
- path: /api
pathType: Prefix
backend:
service:
name: api-service
port:
number: 80
- path: /
pathType: Prefix
backend:
service:
name: web-service
port:
number: 80For complete Kubernetes ingress examples and Gateway API patterns, see references/kubernetes-ingress.md.
Cookie-Based: Load balancer sets cookie to track server affinity
IP Hash: Hash client IP to select backend server
Drawbacks: Uneven load distribution, session lost on server failure, complicates scaling
Architecture: Stateless application servers + centralized session storage (Redis, Memcached)
Benefits:
JWT (JSON Web Tokens): Server generates signed token, client stores and sends with requests
Benefits:
For complete session management patterns and code examples, see references/session-persistence.md.
Route users to nearest server based on geographic location:
Primary/secondary region configuration:
Combine load balancing with CDN:
For complete global load balancing examples with Terraform, see references/global-load-balancing.md.
Choose L4 when:
Choose L7 when:
Choose Cloud-Managed when:
Choose Self-Managed when:
Complete working examples available in examples/ directory:
Cloud Providers:
examples/aws/alb-terraform.tf - AWS ALB with path-based routingexamples/aws/nlb-terraform.tf - AWS NLB for TCP load balancingSelf-Managed:
examples/nginx/http-load-balancing.conf - NGINX HTTP reverse proxyexamples/haproxy/http-lb.cfg - HAProxy configurationexamples/envoy/basic-lb.yaml - Envoy cluster configurationexamples/traefik/kubernetes-ingress.yaml - Traefik IngressRouteKubernetes:
examples/kubernetes/nginx-ingress.yaml - NGINX Ingress with TLSexamples/kubernetes/traefik-ingress.yaml - Traefik IngressRouteexamples/kubernetes/gateway-api.yaml - Gateway API configurationThroughput: Requests per second, bytes transferred, connection rate Latency: Request duration (p50, p95, p99), backend response time, SSL handshake time Errors: HTTP error rates (4xx, 5xx), backend connection failures, health check failures Resource Utilization: CPU, memory, active connections, connection queue depth Health: Healthy/unhealthy backend count, health check success rate
Enable access logs for request/response details, client IPs, response times, error tracking
Symptoms: One server receives disproportionate traffic Causes: Sticky sessions with few clients, IP hash with NAT concentration, long-lived connections Solutions: Switch to least connections, disable sticky sessions, implement connection draining
Symptoms: Servers rapidly transition between healthy/unhealthy Causes: Health check timeout too short, threshold too low, network instability Solutions: Increase interval and timeout, implement hysteresis, use deep health checks
Symptoms: Users logged out when server fails Causes: Sticky sessions without replication, in-memory sessions Solutions: Implement shared session store (Redis), use client-side tokens (JWT)
Related Skills:
infrastructure-as-code - Deploy load balancers via Terraform/Pulumikubernetes-operations - Ingress controllers for K8s traffic managementnetwork-architecture - Network design and topology for load balancingdeploying-applications - Blue-green and canary deployments via load balancersobservability - Load balancer metrics, access logs, distributed tracingsecurity-hardening - WAF integration, rate limiting, DDoS protectionservice-mesh - Envoy as both ingress and service mesh proxyimplementing-tls - TLS termination and certificate management| Use Case | Recommended Solution |
|---|---|
| HTTP web app (AWS) | ALB |
| Non-HTTP protocol (AWS) | NLB |
| Kubernetes HTTP ingress | NGINX Ingress or Traefik |
| Maximum performance | HAProxy |
| Service mesh | Envoy |
| Docker Swarm | Traefik |
| Multi-cloud portable | NGINX or HAProxy |
| Global distribution | CloudFlare, AWS Global Accelerator |
| Traffic Pattern | Algorithm |
|---|---|
| Stateless, similar servers | Round Robin |
| Stateless, different capacity | Weighted Round Robin |
| Long-lived connections | Least Connections |
| Performance-sensitive | Least Response Time |
| Session persistence needed | IP Hash or Cookie |
| Varying server load | Resource-Based |
| Service Type | Check Type | Interval | Timeout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Web app | HTTP /health | 10s | 3s |
| API | HTTP /health/ready | 10s | 5s |
| Database | TCP connect | 5s | 2s |
| Critical service | HTTP deep check | 5s | 3s |
| Background worker | HTTP /live | 30s | 5s |
Load balancing is essential for distributing traffic, ensuring high availability, and enabling horizontal scaling. Choose L4 for raw performance and non-HTTP protocols, L7 for intelligent content-based routing. Prefer cloud-managed load balancers for simplicity and auto-scaling, self-managed for multi-cloud portability and advanced features. Implement proper health checks with hysteresis, avoid sticky sessions when possible, and monitor key metrics continuously.
For deployment patterns, see examples in examples/aws/, examples/nginx/, examples/kubernetes/, and other provider directories.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.