architecting-networks — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited architecting-networks (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Design secure, scalable cloud network architectures using proven patterns across AWS, GCP, and Azure. This skill provides decision frameworks for VPC design, subnet strategy, zero trust implementation, and hybrid connectivity.
Invoke this skill when:
Use When: Small applications, single environment, simple security requirements, team < 10 engineers
Characteristics:
Tradeoffs:
Use When: Multiple environments (dev/staging/prod), strong isolation requirements, compliance mandates separation
Characteristics:
Tradeoffs:
Use When: 5+ VPCs need communication, centralized security inspection required, hybrid connectivity, multi-account setup
Characteristics:
Tradeoffs:
Use When: Small number of VPCs (< 5), low latency critical, no centralized inspection needed
Characteristics:
Tradeoffs:
Use When: Large enterprise with diverse requirements, balancing cost/performance/security
Characteristics:
Tradeoffs:
Number of VPCs?
│
├─► 1 VPC → Flat (Single VPC)
├─► 2-4 VPCs + No inter-VPC communication → Multi-VPC (Isolated)
├─► 2-5 VPCs + Low latency critical → Full Mesh (VPC Peering)
├─► 5+ VPCs + Centralized inspection → Hub-and-Spoke (Transit Gateway)
└─► 10+ VPCs + Mixed requirements → Hybrid (Multi-Pattern)
Additional Considerations:
├─► Hybrid connectivity required? → Hub-and-Spoke preferred
├─► Centralized egress/inspection? → Hub-and-Spoke with Inspection VPC
├─► Multi-account environment? → Hub-and-Spoke with AWS RAM sharing
└─► Cost optimization priority? → Flat or Multi-VPC (avoid TGW fees)Public Subnets:
Private Subnets:
Database Subnets:
Production: Distribute each tier across 3 Availability Zones minimum Dev/Test: 1-2 AZs acceptable for cost savings
VPC Sizing:
Critical Rules:
For detailed subnet planning, see references/subnet-strategy.md
Cost vs Resilience?
│
├─► Cost Priority (Dev/Test)
│ └─► Single NAT Gateway (~$32/month)
│ └─► Risk: Single point of failure
│
├─► Balanced (Most Production)
│ └─► One NAT Gateway per AZ (~$96/month for 3 AZs)
│ └─► Resilience: AZ failure doesn't break connectivity
│
└─► Maximum Resilience
└─► Multiple NAT Gateways per AZ + monitoring
└─► Critical workloads, SLA-dependent
Alternative: Centralized Egress Pattern
└─► Hub-and-Spoke: Single egress VPC with NAT
└─► Reduces NAT Gateway count, centralized loggingNo Outbound Internet Needed?
Characteristics:
Use For:
Best Practices:
Characteristics:
Use For:
Best Practices:
For security group architecture patterns, see references/security-controls.md
Microsegmentation:
Identity-Based Access:
Continuous Verification:
For zero trust architecture patterns, see references/zero-trust-networking.md
Use When: Dev/test environments, backup connectivity, temporary connections
Characteristics:
Use When: Production workloads, large data transfers, real-time applications
Characteristics:
Use When: Multiple VPCs need on-premises connectivity
Benefits:
For hybrid connectivity patterns and examples, see references/hybrid-connectivity.md
| Concept | AWS | GCP | Azure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Network | VPC | VPC | Virtual Network (VNet) |
| Subnets | Subnets (AZ-scoped) | Subnets (Regional) | Subnets |
| NAT | NAT Gateway | Cloud NAT | NAT Gateway |
| Peering | VPC Peering | VPC Peering | VNet Peering |
| Hub-Spoke | Transit Gateway | Cloud Router | Virtual WAN |
| Private Endpoints | PrivateLink | Private Service Connect | Private Link |
| Hybrid VPN | VPN | Cloud VPN | VPN Gateway |
| Hybrid Dedicated | Direct Connect | Cloud Interconnect | ExpressRoute |
AWS:
GCP:
Azure:
For multi-cloud implementations, see references/multi-cloud-networking.md
Enable Flow Logs for:
Configuration:
Monitor:
Alert On:
For observability patterns and flow log analysis, see references/network-observability.md
Reduce NAT Gateway Costs:
Reduce Data Transfer Costs:
Avoid Transit Gateway Costs:
For detailed cost optimization strategies, see references/cost-optimization.md
Use pattern selection framework above to choose:
Use infrastructure-as-code skill to implement with Terraform/Pulumi
| Requirement | Recommended Pattern |
|---|---|
| Single environment | Flat (Single VPC) |
| Multiple isolated environments | Multi-VPC (Isolated) |
| 2-5 VPCs, low latency | Full Mesh (Peering) |
| 5+ VPCs, centralized security | Hub-and-Spoke (TGW) |
| Hybrid connectivity | Hub-and-Spoke (TGW) |
| Cost optimization | Flat or Multi-VPC |
| Scenario | Configuration | Monthly Cost (3 AZs) |
|---|---|---|
| Dev/Test | Single NAT | ~$32 |
| Production | NAT per AZ | ~$96 |
| Centralized Egress | Hub VPC NAT | ~$32-96 |
| Requirement | Solution | Throughput | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dev/Test | VPN | ~1.25 Gbps | Variable |
| Production | Direct Connect | Up to 100 Gbps | Low, consistent |
| Backup | VPN (backup to DX) | ~1.25 Gbps | Variable |
Detailed Guides:
references/vpc-design-patterns.md - Comprehensive pattern descriptions with diagramsreferences/subnet-strategy.md - CIDR planning, IPAM, multi-AZ best practicesreferences/zero-trust-networking.md - Microsegmentation, IAM integration, continuous verificationreferences/hybrid-connectivity.md - VPN, Direct Connect, Transit Gateway patternsreferences/multi-cloud-networking.md - AWS, GCP, Azure implementationsreferences/security-controls.md - Security groups, NACLs, firewall patternsreferences/private-networking.md - VPC Endpoints, PrivateLink, Private Service Connectreferences/multi-region-networking.md - Cross-region peering, global load balancingreferences/network-observability.md - Flow logs, monitoring, troubleshootingreferences/cost-optimization.md - Egress reduction, NAT strategiesCode Examples:
examples/aws/ - AWS VPC patterns (flat, hub-spoke, peering, VPN, Direct Connect)examples/gcp/ - GCP VPC patterns (custom VPC, Shared VPC, Cloud Interconnect)examples/azure/ - Azure VNet patterns (hub-spoke, peering, ExpressRoute)examples/multi-cloud/ - Cross-cloud connectivity examplesUtility Scripts:
scripts/cidr-calculator.py - Calculate CIDR blocks and plan IP addressingscripts/cost-estimator.sh - Estimate network infrastructure costsscripts/validate-sg-rules.py - Validate security group rule configurationsscripts/flow-log-analyzer.py - Analyze VPC flow logs for security and costUse `infrastructure-as-code` skill to:
Use `kubernetes-operations` skill to:
Use `security-hardening` skill to:
Use `observability` skill to:
Use `disaster-recovery` skill to:
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.