pipeline-account-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited pipeline-account-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Audit pipeline accounts by analyzing engagement data, mapping stakeholders, identifying gaps, and prioritizing next actions.
When a user wants to review their pipeline, systematically analyze each account and produce an actionable summary.
mcp__claude_ai_Amplemarket__list_accounts with relevant filters:owner_email if the user wants to review their own accountstags if filtering by segment or categoryname or domain if looking at specific accountspage_size to 20 for a manageable review batchIf no filters are specified, ask the user: "Would you like to review all accounts, or filter by owner, tags, or specific accounts?"
mcp__claude_ai_Amplemarket__get_account for each account ID returned. Extract:mcp__claude_ai_Amplemarket__search_people for the top-priority accounts with:company_domains: [account domain]person_seniorities: ["C-Suite", "VP", "Head", "Director", "Manager"]full_output: truepage_size: 10Compare found stakeholders against the contacts already engaged (from account data) to identify gaps in the buying committee.
The default thresholds (7-day / 30-day / 90-day engagement windows) work for typical mid-market sales cycles of 30-60 days. Adjust them for different selling motions:
Tell the user: "I'm using default health scoring for a mid-market sales cycle. Want me to adjust thresholds for your typical deal length?"
User prompt: "Review my pipeline - my email is [email protected]"
What the skill does:
mcp__claude_ai_Amplemarket__list_accounts with owner_email: "[email protected]".mcp__claude_ai_Amplemarket__get_account for each account.mcp__claude_ai_Amplemarket__search_people for top accounts to find stakeholder gaps.Example output:
PIPELINE REVIEW - [email protected]
Executive Summary
Account Priority Table
| Rank | Account | Health | Tier | Stage | Engaged Contacts | Last Activity | Top Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Acme Corp | 9/10 | Hot | Negotiation | 4 | 2 days ago | Send revised proposal |
| 2 | TechFlow | 8/10 | Hot | Demo Scheduled | 3 | 5 days ago | Prep for demo, loop in CTO |
| 3 | DataPrime | 8/10 | Hot | Evaluation | 3 | 1 day ago | Share case study |
| 4 | CloudBase | 6/10 | Warm | Prospecting | 2 | 12 days ago | Multi-thread to VP Eng |
| 5 | FinServ Inc | 5/10 | Warm | Prospecting | 1 | 20 days ago | Find champion in IT |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 16 | OldCorp | 2/10 | Cold | None | 0 | 90+ days ago | Re-evaluate ICP fit |
| 17 | StaleInc | 3/10 | At Risk | Stalled | 2 | 45 days ago | Breakup email to re-engage |
| 18 | GhostCo | 1/10 | At Risk | Stalled | 1 | 60 days ago | New stakeholder approach |
Stakeholder Gap Analysis (Top 5 Accounts)
| Account | Engaged Roles | Missing Roles | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acme Corp | CRO, VP Sales, Dir Ops, CFO | CTO | Search for and engage CTO for technical buy-in |
| TechFlow | VP Eng, Dir Product, CTO | CFO/Finance | Loop in finance before pricing discussion |
| DataPrime | CMO, Dir Marketing, VP Sales | CTO/IT | No technical evaluator - find one before POC |
| CloudBase | VP Eng, Senior Dev | VP/Dir level decision maker | Need executive sponsor |
| FinServ Inc | Dir IT | Everyone else | Single-threaded - high risk, need 2+ more contacts |
User prompt: "Show me account health for my enterprise accounts"
What the skill does:
mcp__claude_ai_Amplemarket__list_accounts with tags: ["enterprise"].User prompt: "Which accounts should I focus on this week? I want to find stalled deals."
What the skill does:
| Problem | Solution |
|---|---|
| No accounts returned | Fallback chain: 1) Remove all filters and call list_accounts to verify accounts exist. 2) Try without owner_email in case the email format is different. 3) Try searching by tags or name instead. 4) If still empty, inform user: "No accounts found. This may mean accounts haven't been imported into Amplemarket yet." |
| Account details are sparse | Score with available data and explicitly flag which scoring factors were affected. For example: "Engagement score: 0/3 (no activity data available). This score may underrepresent account health if engagement is tracked outside Amplemarket." |
| Too many accounts to review | Offer to batch the review. Start with accounts that have active opportunities, then move to prospecting-stage accounts. |
| Stakeholder search returns too many people | Narrow person_seniorities to "C-Suite" and "VP" only for large companies. |
| User wants to take action on a specific account | Pivot to the competitive-account-research skill for a deep dive, or build-targeted-lead-list to add missing stakeholders. |
| Engagement history data seems stale | Flag with: "[Data may be stale - last activity DATE]. This may not reflect recent interactions outside Amplemarket." Then suggest: "Want me to re-enrich this account's contacts for the latest signals?" |
| Person enrichment succeeds but company enrichment fails for a pipeline account | Fallback chain: 1) Use account-level data from get_account as the primary source. 2) Try enrich_company with domain instead of name. 3) Try the LinkedIn company URL. 4) Score based on internal engagement data and flag: "Company enrichment unavailable - scoring based on internal data only." |
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.