alterlab-tr-research-ethics — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited alterlab-tr-research-ethics (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The Turkey-specific counterpart to alterlab-research-ethics. Given a study description, it answers the first question every Turkish researcher faces — which etik kurul (ethics committee) do I need? — then scaffolds the bilingual dossier (başvuru formu, dilekçe, onam formu) and lints the consent form against the TİTCK minimum-content checklist. Glossary on first use: etik kurul = ethics committee; onam / olur formu = informed-consent form; dilekçe = formal cover petition; TİTCK = Türkiye İlaç ve Tıbbi Cihaz Kurumu (Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency); öz = abstract.
This skill scaffolds and routes. It does not grant approval, and a draft it produces is not a substitute for your institution's own committee templates, which always take precedence.
Use it when the request is about Turkish human-subjects ethics review:
IEU anket çalışması için etik kurul başvurusu hazırla
Bu cihaz çalışması için TİTCK onayı / klinik araştırma etik kurulu gerekir mi?
Draft a Turkish bilgilendirilmiş onam (informed consent) form for an interview study
Which ethics committee do I need for a focus-group study at a Turkish university?
Check my olur formu against the TİTCK minimum-content rulesRoute adjacent requests to the correct sibling skill instead of firing here:
| Request | Route to |
|---|---|
| US/EU IRB, Belmont Report, HIPAA, GDPR, non-Turkey ethics board | alterlab-research-ethics |
| KVKK-compliant data management plan, anonymization, VERBIS, açık rıza data basis | alterlab-kvkk-dmp |
| TÜBİTAK Veri Yönetim Planı, Aperta deposit, open-access mandate | alterlab-aperta |
| Drafting the TÜBİTAK ARDEB 1001/1002-A proposal narrative | alterlab-tubitak-proposal |
| Survey instrument design / item wording (not the ethics dossier) | alterlab-survey-design |
| Qualitative interview/focus-group method design | alterlab-qualitative-methods |
| Pre-registration of hypotheses & analysis plan | alterlab-open-science |
| Checking a journal's TR Dizin indexing status | alterlab-trdizin |
| Docentlik (associate-professorship) eligibility / point math | alterlab-docentlik-eligibility |
| Akademik teşvik (academic-incentive) scoring | alterlab-akademik-tesvik |
The boundary with alterlab-kvkk-dmp matters: ethics review (this skill) and KVKK data protection (that skill) are two separate legal tracks for the same study. A full project usually needs both — scaffold the etik kurul dossier here, then hand off to alterlab-kvkk-dmp for the data plan.
Turkish ethics review has two doors, and sending a study to the wrong one wastes a review cycle. Route by what the study does, per references/etik_kurul_routing.md:
Door 1 — Üniversite Girişimsel Olmayan (non-interventional) Etik Kurulu. Triggered by the TR Dizin/ULAKBİM rule (mandatory for publications from 2020): any study collecting data from participants via survey (anket), interview (görüşme), focus group (odak grup), observation (gözlem), or experiment (deney) needs ethics-committee approval. For non-clinical social/behavioral/education research this is the researcher's own university non-interventional committee.
Door 2 — TİTCK-onaylı Klinik Araştırmalar Etik Kurulu + ayrı TİTCK izni. Studies on human medicinal products, medical devices, cosmetics, stem cells, or bioavailability/bioequivalence (BA/BE) require a committee approved by TİTCK and a separate TİTCK start permit. Per TİTCK, clinical research is conducted "TİTCK tarafından onay verilen Etik Kurulların onayı ve Sağlık Bakanlığının izni ile." A decision from a committee not approved by TİTCK is legally void for clinical research — verify the committee's TİTCK accreditation before you submit.
Governing instrument: Beşeri Tıbbi Ürünlerin Klinik Araştırmaları Hakkında Yönetmelik (Regulation on Clinical Research of Human Medicinal Products), mevzuat.gov.tr MevzuatNo 40207. See references/etik_kurul_routing.md for the full decision tree, edge cases (retrospective record review, secondary data, minors/vulnerable groups), and source citations.
Some studies hit both doors (e.g. a device trial that also runs a patient survey). When in doubt, the clinical track governs and you escalate to Door 2.
A bilingual (Turkish primary, English gloss) dossier skeleton. Pull the templates from references/dossier_templates.md:
roster, aim & rationale (öz), design, population & sample, instruments, risk/benefit, data-handling summary (with a pointer to the KVKK plan), and the informed-consent procedure.
built to satisfy the TİTCK minimum-content checklist (below).
data-collection-permission letters, and any institutional annexes.
Always tell the user that their own university committee's official form overrides this skeleton where the two differ.
The Bilgilendirilmiş Gönüllü Olur Formu must, at minimum, carry the elements in references/consent_minimum_contents.md. Headline items:
page for clinical-track forms).
what participation involves.
may withdraw at any time without penalty.
sponsor/contact chain as the regulation requires.
uv run python skills/turkish-academia/alterlab-tr-research-ethics/scripts/consent_form_check.py \
path/to/olur_formu.mdThe linter (scripts/consent_form_check.py, standard-library only) scans a draft for the required elements above (in Turkish or English) and prints a per-element PASS / MISSING table plus an overall verdict. It is a completeness aid, not a legal sign-off: a PASS means the checklist elements are present, not that the wording satisfies the committee. Run it, read the JSON/table, and report the MISSING items to the user with the exact element name.
type) applies and why, citing the trigger (e.g. "collects interview data → non-interventional committee" or "tests a medical device → TİTCK clinical committee + permit").
confirm the committee is TİTCK-approved and that a separate TİTCK permit is required.
references/dossier_templates.md, filled withthe study's specifics; keep Turkish as the primary language with an English gloss.
scripts/consent_form_check.py and surface MISSING elements.
alterlab-kvkk-dmp and (if funded /open-access) the deposit half to alterlab-aperta.
committee's own decision are authoritative. Caps, forms, and checklists change — verify against the current TİTCK / university committee documents before submission.
clinical) and the trigger that put the study there?
requirement and the "non-approved committee = legally void" rule?
pass/fail?
alterlab-kvkk-dmp rather than improvising KVKKadvice here?
must be verified against current sources?
references/etik_kurul_routing.md — full two-door decision tree, trigger list,edge cases, and primary-source citations.
references/consent_minimum_contents.md — the TİTCK minimum-content checklistthe linter enforces, element by element.
references/dossier_templates.md — bilingual başvuru formu, dilekçe, and olurformu skeletons plus the annex checklist.
Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.