student-feedback-retention-analysis — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited student-feedback-retention-analysis (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
业务诊断助手用于回答「这件事该怎么做」、学员反馈、续费、社群运营,适合运营、市场营销、教育培训、内容媒体在明确业务目标、内容材料或分析对象后调用。 它会结合学员反馈记录、粘贴学员评价、续费顾虑、退课原因、社群反馈或访谈摘录。等输入,整理关键上下文,并输出摘要、诊断结论、行动建议和可复用交付物,便于继续执行、复盘或交付。
适用场景
通过导出的 Python runner 直接调用 AI Skills API:
基础调用
python3 scripts/run.py --params '{}'带常用参数调用
python3 scripts/run.py --params '{"feedbackExportFile":"上传反馈导出"}'| 参数 | 类型 | 必填 | 默认 | 说明 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
feedbackExportFile | string | 否 | - | 上传问卷、NPS、社群反馈、客服记录或续费表 |
retentionEventNotes | string | 否 | - | 补充开营、作业、直播、社群、续费活动和异常时间点 |
studentFeedbackText | string | 否 | - | 粘贴学员评价、续费顾虑、退课原因、社群反馈或访谈摘录 |
surveyDashboardLink | string | 否 | - | 填写公开可访问的问卷结果、反馈页面或复盘链接;需要传可访问的完整 URL |
learnerCohortContext | string | 否 | - | 说明课程类型、班型、学员阶段、价格、交付周期和续费节点 |
retentionAnalysisFocus | string | 否 | 流失原因 | 选择本次学员反馈留存分析最需要优先处理的方向;可选值:流失原因、续费障碍、服务改进、挽回动作 |
完整机器可读参数结构见 references/form-schema.json。
当前技能没有需要额外查表的分类参数。
当前技能直接接收 JSON 参数;如果参数里包含链接字段,请传完整、可访问的 URL。
下面的示例参数可直接传给 scripts/run.py,runner 会把它们发送给 AI Skills API。
python3 scripts/run.py --params '{"feedbackExportFile":"上传反馈导出"}'等价的 --params JSON:
{
"feedbackExportFile": "上传反馈导出"
}{
"success": true,
"data": {
"message": "示例结果请以技能真实返回结构为准。"
},
"meta": {
"executionTime": 842,
"cached": false
}
}AISKILLS_BASE_URL:默认 https://ai-skills.aiAISKILLS_API_KEY:必填,用于认证调用AISKILLS_TENANT_ID:默认 default~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.