medical-literature-evidence-map — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited medical-literature-evidence-map (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
业务诊断助手用于回答「这件事该怎么做」、医学文献、证据地图、科研辅助,适合运营、市场营销、healthcare、教育培训在明确业务目标、内容材料或分析对象后调用。 它会结合文献摘要与问题、粘贴研究问题、PICO、文献摘要、结论片段或证据摘录。等输入,整理关键上下文,并输出摘要、诊断结论、行动建议和可复用交付物,便于继续执行、复盘或交付。
适用场景
通过导出的 Python runner 直接调用 AI Skills API:
基础调用
python3 scripts/run.py --params '{}'带常用参数调用
python3 scripts/run.py --params '{"evidenceMapFocus":"证据分层"}'| 参数 | 类型 | 必填 | 默认 | 说明 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
evidenceMapFocus | string | 否 | 证据分层 | 选择本次医学文献证据地图最需要优先处理的方向;可选值:证据分层、研究差异、结论边界、待补文献 |
literatureSearchLink | string | 否 | - | 填写公开可访问的 PubMed、期刊、指南或数据库检索链接;需要传可访问的完整 URL |
inclusionCriteriaNotes | string | 否 | - | 补充时间范围、研究类型、排除条件、语言限制和偏倚关注点 |
literatureEvidenceFile | string | 否 | - | 上传文献清单、摘要导出、证据表或阅读笔记 |
literatureAbstractsText | string | 否 | - | 粘贴研究问题、PICO、文献摘要、结论片段或证据摘录 |
researchQuestionContext | string | 否 | - | 说明疾病/干预/人群/结局、内部汇报或内容支持目的 |
完整机器可读参数结构见 references/form-schema.json。
当前技能没有需要额外查表的分类参数。
当前技能直接接收 JSON 参数;如果参数里包含链接字段,请传完整、可访问的 URL。
下面的示例参数可直接传给 scripts/run.py,runner 会把它们发送给 AI Skills API。
python3 scripts/run.py --params '{"evidenceMapFocus":"证据分层"}'等价的 --params JSON:
{
"evidenceMapFocus": "证据分层"
}{
"success": true,
"data": {
"message": "示例结果请以技能真实返回结构为准。"
},
"meta": {
"executionTime": 842,
"cached": false
}
}AISKILLS_BASE_URL:默认 https://ai-skills.aiAISKILLS_API_KEY:必填,用于认证调用AISKILLS_TENANT_ID:默认 default~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.