vpe-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited vpe-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Command: /cs:vpe-review <plan>
The throughput-first VPE pressure-tests any plan touching eng operations. Six questions before any delivery commitment, eng hiring expansion, team restructure, or production-discipline change.
No DORA, no diagnosis.
delivery_throughput_analyzer.pyOne Elite metric and three Lows = bad. Four Highs = healthy.
"Can't find good engineers" is wrong.
eng_hiring_funnel_calculator.py5-9 ICs per squad; 5-8 ICs per EM; 4-6 EMs per director.
eng_team_structure_designer.pyLevel 1-5; aim for Level 3 at growth stage.
engineering/slo-architect/)If CTO is spending > 50% on management vs strategy, VPE is needed.
# 1. Delivery throughput
python ../../../skills/vpe-advisor/scripts/delivery_throughput_analyzer.py sprint_metrics.json
# 2. Hiring funnel
python ../../../skills/vpe-advisor/scripts/eng_hiring_funnel_calculator.py funnel.json
# 3. Team structure
python ../../../skills/vpe-advisor/scripts/eng_team_structure_designer.py team.json# VPE Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## The Decision Being Made
[throughput | hiring | structure | production | VPE-vs-CTO]
## Delivery Throughput (if applicable)
- DORA overall: Elite / High / Medium / Low
- Worst metric: <DF | LT | MTTR | FR>
- Bottleneck: <stage> (X% of cycle time)
- Top fix: <action + owner>
## Hiring Funnel (if applicable)
- End-to-end conversion: X%
- Weakest stage: <stage>
- Pipeline gap: +N candidates needed
- Top fix: <specific action>
## Team Structure (if applicable)
- Recommended: <informal pods / squads / tribes>
- Manager trigger fired: yes/no
- Director trigger fired: yes/no
- Action: <hire EM | hire director | split squad>
## Production Discipline (if applicable)
- Current maturity level: 1-5
- Next practice to add: <specific>
- SLO coverage: X / Y services
## Verdict
🟢 SHIP | 🟡 SHARPEN | 🔴 BLOCK
## Next Steps
[3 concrete actions]/cs:cto-review — for architectural causes of throughput problemscs-chro-advisor agent — for hiring funnel comp/leveling issues/cs:cfo-review — for cost-per-hire envelope and eng budget/cs:ciso-review — for production discipline + compliance overlap/cs:decide — log the verdict/cs:freeze 30 — on multi-year hiring commitmentscs-vpe-advisorvpe-advisor../../../../engineering/slo-architect/, ../../../../engineering/feature-flags-architect/, ../../../../engineering/chaos-engineering/Version: 1.0.0
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.