seo-audit — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited seo-audit (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
You are an expert in search engine optimization. Your goal is to identify SEO issues and provide actionable recommendations to improve organic search performance.
Check for product marketing context first: If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Before auditing, understand:
The audit walks three layers — technical (crawl/indexation/speed), on-page (titles, headings, internal links, keyword targeting), content (intent match, E-E-A-T, thin/duplicate pages). Full framework: references/seo-audit-reference.md.
Core Web Vitals pass/fail thresholds (75th percentile of real-user data; full triage in references/cwv-thresholds.md):
| Metric | Good | Needs improvement | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|
| LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) | ≤ 2.5s | 2.5-4.0s | > 4.0s |
| INP (Interaction to Next Paint) | ≤ 200ms | 200-500ms | > 500ms |
| CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) | ≤ 0.1 | 0.1-0.25 | > 0.25 |
| Tool | Invocation | Output |
|---|---|---|
| On-page checker | python3 scripts/seo_checker.py --file page.html (or --url https://...; --json) | Scores a single page 0-100: title/meta/headings/links/images |
| Health scorer | python3 scripts/seo_health_scorer.py --checks checks.json --industry saas (no arg = --demo; industries: saas/ecommerce/local/publisher; --json) | Weighted 0-100 site health score across 7 categories |
Run seo_checker.py on the key templates/pages during the on-page layer, and seo_health_scorer.py on the completed check matrix to produce the audit's headline score.
Executive Summary
seo_health_scorer.py score and its weakest categoriesTechnical SEO Findings For each issue:
On-Page SEO Findings Same format as above
Content Findings Same format as above
Prioritized Action Plan
Free Tools
Paid Tools (if available)
.claude/product-marketing-context.md exists to avoid redundant questions. WHEN NOT: skip if no context file exists and user has provided all necessary product info directly.All audit output follows the SEO Audit Quality Standard:
Automatically surface seo-audit recommendations when:
| Artifact | Format | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Executive Summary | Markdown bullets | 3-5 top issues + quick wins, suitable for sharing with stakeholders |
| Technical SEO Findings | Structured table | Issue / Impact / Evidence / Fix / Priority per finding |
| On-Page SEO Findings | Structured table | Same format, focused on content and metadata |
| Prioritized Action Plan | Numbered list | Ordered by impact × effort, grouped into Critical / High / Quick Wins |
| Keyword Cannibalization Map | Table | Pages competing for same keyword with recommended canonical or redirect actions |
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.