cmo-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited cmo-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Command: /cs:cmo-review <plan>
The narrative-first strategist pressure-tests positioning before debating tactics.
Name one real person in your ICP. Company, title, what they do daily, what they hate.
What job is the customer hiring this product to do, and what's the alternative they use today?
One sentence: For [ICP], who needs [job], we are [category] that [differentiator] unlike [alternative].
Where does the customer first hear your name — and is it inbound or outbound at this stage?
Per channel: what's CAC, what's payback in months, and is it improving?
If a well-funded competitor copies your messaging tomorrow, what's still yours?
python ../../../skills/cmo-advisor/scripts/marketing_budget_modeler.py
python ../../../skills/cmo-advisor/scripts/growth_model_simulator.py# CMO Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## Positioning
One-sentence statement: <here>
## ICP
- Named persona: <name, title, company>
- JTBD: <one sentence in their words>
## Channel Mix
- Primary: <channel> | CAC $X | Payback Ym
- Secondary: <channel> | CAC $X | Payback Ym
## Verdict
🟢 / 🟡 / 🔴
## Next Steps
[3 concrete actions]/cs:cro-review — pipeline contribution check/cs:cpo-review — product ↔ positioning alignment/cs:decide — log the verdictcs-cmo-advisorcmo-advisor../../../../marketing-skill/Version: 1.0.0
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.